The Perceived Utility of Human and Automated Aids in a Visual Detection Task

By Mary T. Dzindolet, Linda G. Pierce, Hall P. Beck, Lloyd A. Dawe. 2002

412 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Social Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AI (2019, background): “Authors Dzindolet et al., 2003; see also Dzindolet et al., 2002 AI System Simulated decision aid.”
Not All Trust Is Created Equal: Dispositional and History-Based Trust in Human-Automation Interactions (2008, background): “However, research indicates that some different reactions to human versus machine aids may exist (Dzindolet et al., 2002; Lewandowsky, Mundy, & Tan, 2000; Madhavan & Wiegmann, 2007) or that trust in another human is influenced by a greater number of factors than trust in a machine (e.g., Bonaccio &…”
When do people rely on algorithms (2016, background): “Prior work focusing on algorithm aversion examined situations in which participants saw an algorithm make errors (Dietvorst et al., 2015; Dzindolet et al., 2002).”
Measurement of Trust in Automation: A Narrative Review and Reference Guide (2021, background): “There is a wide range of disposition components that may be captured using self-report TiA measures, including the following: operators’ tendency to be complacent toward automation (Automation-Induced Complacency Potential Rating Scale, Singh et al., 1993); operators’ high expectations for the autom”
Effects of Information Source, Pedigree, and Reliability on Operator Interaction With Decision Support Systems (2007, background): “…(e.g., Dzindolet, Pierce, Beck, & Dawe, 2002; Dzindolet et al., 2001; Lerch et al., 1997) and the effects of framing on automation trust (e.g., Dzindolet et al., 2002; Lacson, Wiegmann, & Madhavan, 2003), we hypothesized trust in automation to be higher than in humans when portrayed as…”
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance (2004, background): “The framework of Dzindolet et al. (2002) is particularly useful in describing how the motivational processes associated with expected effort complement cognitive processes associated with automation biases to explain reliance, issues that are distributed across the upper part of Figure 4.”
Similarities and differences between human–human and human–automation trust: an integrative review (2007, background): “For example, in the Dzindolet et al. (2002) study, participants paired with automated aids recounted in detail instances in which they were highly confident that the aid had made an error in target detection compared to those paired with a human aid.”
I Trust It, but I Don’t Know Why (2013, background): “This schema is a mental construct that reflects the participants’ expectations for perfect automation performance (Dzindolet et al., 2002).”