Born Unequal: A Study of the Helpfulness of User-Generated Product Reviews
By Yue Pan, Jason Q. Zhang. 2011
660 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f6273d98255af9a025380ff910d09d7f217b4434
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
- Zhibin Lin
- Fraser McLeay
- Claudio Vitari
- Elisabetta Raguseo
- Fabiano Feldhaus
- Thorsten Hennig-Thurau
- Li-Wen Shih
- Chuan-Hoo Tan
In Marketing
- Claudio Vitari
- Elisabetta Raguseo
- Zhibin Lin
- Fraser McLeay
- Raffaele Filieri
- Bruce Tsui
- Victoria D. Bush
- Fabiano Feldhaus
In Sociology and Political Science
- Claudio Vitari
- Elisabetta Raguseo
- Raffaele Filieri
- Zhibin Lin
- Fraser McLeay
- Bruce Tsui
- Victoria D. Bush
- Violetta Wilk
Citations in the corpus
- Consumer perceptions of information helpfulness and determinants of purchase intention in online consumer reviews of services (2018, background): “focused on review text characteristics adopted datasets of customer reviews from e-tailers, measuring review length, readability, and linguistic correctness [4, 16, 30, 38, 52, 54, 59, 62].”
- Research Note - When Do Consumers Value Positive vs. Negative Reviews? An Empirical Investigation of Confirmation Bias in Online Word of Mouth (2015, background): “Thus, the positive–negative asymmetry often studied in the literature can be a consequence of confirmation bias (for similar arguments, see Pan and Zhang (2011).”
- A big data exploration of the informational and normative influences on the helpfulness of online restaurant reviews (2021, result): “Whereas, in direct contrast to these findings, Pan and Zhang (2011) observed a positivity bias in the relationship between review valence (star rating) and helpfulness, emphasising that positivity levels are heightened for experience goods.”
- Extremely Negative Ratings and Online Consumer Review Helpfulness: The Moderating Role of Product Quality Signals (2020, background): “Moreover, the discussion around the factors that influence the helpfulness of online consumer reviews the most is broadening (Filieri 2015; Kwok and Xie 2016; Mudambi and Schuff 2010; Pan and Zhang 2011; S. Park and Nicolau 2015; M. Lee et al. 2017; Shin et al. 2019; Wang, Tang, and Kim 2019).”
- Importance of Online Product Reviews from a Consumer's Perspective (2013, background): “Another study of Pan and Zhang [3] showed that the perceived helpfulness of a review positively correlates with the length of the review, which means that a long review text is usually more helpful than a short review text.”
- Does Twitter matter? The impact of microblogging word of mouth on consumers’ adoption of new movies (2014, positive): “Pan and Zhang (2011) suggest that the length of EWOM reviews increases perceived helpfulness.”
- Helpfulness of Online Product Reviews as Seen by Consumers: Source and Content Features (2013, methodology): “For instance, Mudambi and Schuff (2010) connect the review helpfulness to the review diagnosticity [51], while Pan and Zhang [53] argue that the helpfulness can be used interchangeably with review usefulness.”
- Assisting consumers in detecting fake reviews: The role of identity information disclosure and consensus (2016, background): “Recent findings that confirmed the role of review characteristics such as review length (Pan and Zhang, 2011, , see results of the preliminary study in the present research), word use (Ott et al., 2011), and word duplication (Bhattarai, Rus and Dasgupta, 2009) on consumers’ perceptions and the…”
- Compliance with eWOM: the influence of hotel reviews on booking intention from the perspective of consumer conformity. (2015, background): “As a result, eWOM exerts greater and wider influence than traditional WOM (Pan and Zhang, 2011).”