Representing People, Representing Nature, Representing the World

By J. O'Neill. 2001

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. J. Paavola
2. Anna Straton
3. Alex Y. Lo
4. S. Jackson
5. Oswald Marinoni
6. W. Proctor
7. E. Woodward
8. H. Wittmer

Citations in the corpus

• Deliberative Monetary Valuation: In Search of a Democratic and Value Plural Approach to Environmental Policy (2013, background): “These included not only those from economics (Brown et al., 1995; Spash, 2001), but also researchers from decision science (Gregory et al., 1993), politics (Jacobs, 1997; Ward, 1999), human geography (Clark et al., 2000) and applied philosophy (Sagoff, 1998; O’Neill, 2001).”
• Publics* and woodlands in England: well-being, local identity, social learning, conflict and management (2005, background): “The importance of qualitative approaches is that they can provide insights into the meanings of the responses people give to questions asked of them and also offer insights into why they respond as they do in particular situations ( O’Neill, 2001 ).”
• How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts (2006, background): “A high degree of transparency seems to be the most promising measure to achieve effective and legitimate conflict resolution procedures in the face of doubts on representativeness (O’Neill, 2001).”
• Exploring and Evaluating Scenarios for a River Catchment in Northern Australia Using Scenario Development, Multi-criteria Analysis and a Deliberative Process as a Tool for Water Planning (2011, background): “2006); (b) enable transparency (Lafferty and Meadowcroft 1996; O’Neill 2001) and participation in the sense of Renn et al.”
• Environmental Valuation Analysis, Public Deliberation, and their Pragmatic Syntheses: A Critical Appraisal (2001, background): “More important, as O'Neill (2001) points out, even were such a statistical sample obtainable this would meet only one of the many relevant types of representation.”
• Deliberative monetary valuation (DMV): Issues in combining economic and political processes to value environmental change (2007, background): “Representation of silent voices such as non-humans and future generations remains a problematic issue in all processes of environmental valuation (O'Neill, 2001).”
• How Much is that Ecosystem in the Window? The One with the Bio-diverse Trail (2008, background): “This consultation requires taking note of how silent voices can be represented in decision processes (see OʼNeill, 2001).”
• Fair adaptation to climate change (2006, background): “Similarly, the interests of future generations and non-human species are not reflected in the outcomes of plans and decisions because they are not represented effectively (O’Neill, 2001).”