How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts

By H. Wittmer, Felix Rauschmayer, B. Klauer. 2006

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/45bb7479b10a6d770e25c06471556c25391b8e9b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

Environmental conflict analysis using an integrated grey clustering and entropy-weight method: A case study of a mining project in Peru (2016, background): “In addition, considering that environmental conflict is a social issue and a very inconstant and subjective topic, which requires a permanent analysis, and that one of the criteria for evaluating methods for ECA is the cost (Wittmer et al., 2006), in this aspect an approach based in grey systems wou”
Assessing the Ecological Impacts of Bioenergy Projects (2008, background): “Some of the engagement processes used in the GM crop debate [33, 53] offer useful models, but many others are available [69, 72].”
On the ‘Efficient Boundaries of the State’: The Contribution of Transaction-Costs Economics to the Analysis of Decentralization and Devolution in Natural Resource Management (2004, background): “…decision analysis combined with participatory processes offers specific tools for supporting such types of decisions (compare Wittmer et al, 2004). to refer to the costs from free-riding, shirking, rent-seeking, corruption, and moral hazard arising in different governance…”
Exploring and Evaluating Scenarios for a River Catchment in Northern Australia Using Scenario Development, Multi-criteria Analysis and a Deliberative Process as a Tool for Water Planning (2011, methodology): “There is demand for tools that can (a) effectively include the range of disciplinary, stakeholder and institutional components that impact on resource planning (see, for example, Wilson and Howarth 2002), including ecological and social complexity ( Wittmer et al. 2006 ); (b) enable transparency (La”
Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach (2017, background): “com recognize the diversity of values as well as resolution approaches when value conflicts arise [26].”