How Much is that Ecosystem in the Window? The One with the Bio-diverse Trail
By C. Spash. 2008
214 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f3654b2a930adbc57870e40dca52f560a16757c3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Global and Planetary Change
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Citations in the corpus
- The Shallow or the Deep Ecological Economics Movement (2013, background): “As a result the discourse over ecosystems and biodiversity loss is increasingly in terms of monetary value and the ‘solutions’ involve the spread of neo-liberal markets (Spash, 2008b, 2011b).”
- The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes (2010, background): “…concerns and market strategies can modify the way humans perceive and relate to nature in a way that in the long run may be counterproductive for conservation purposes (Rees, 1998; Martínez-Alier, 2002; Robertson, 2004; McCauley, 2006; Soma, 2006; Spash, 2008a; Kosoy and Corbera, this issue).”
- Payments for Ecosystem Services: Rife With Problems and Potential—For Transformation Towards Sustainability (2017, background): “However, a substantial gap remains between these constructive suggestions for improving PES programs and the more fundamental critiques that have been levied against PES and market-based mechanisms more generally (Kosoy & Corbera, 2010; McAfee & Shapiro, 2010; Spash, 2008).”
- Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique (2011, background): “A pluralist framework should also improve the transparency of the evaluation process by bringing underlying normative motivations and distributional issues to the forum, rather than living them hidden in the price mechanism (Spash, 2008).”
- Challenges in framing the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: the TEEB initiative (2010, unknown): “Alternatives and complementary methods to monetary valuation need to be kept in mind [57 ,66 ,67].”
- Social Ecological Economics: Understanding the Past to See the Future (2011, background): “Treating ecosystems as if some artifact for trading in a market is highly problematic on many grounds (Spash 2008b).”
- The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries - evidence from the Solomon Islands (2011, background): “However, values are not pre-formed but ‘constructed’ through deliberation, and conventional methodological individualism fails both to capture collective values and to make use of dialogue in order to encourage reflection of what a persons’ values truly are (Spash, 2008b).”
- Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services (2011, background): “These political-economic practices have also unfolded in the fields of environmental science, policy and conservation (Castree, 2003; Foster et al., 2009; Liverman, 2004; McAfee, 1999; O’Connor, 1994; Robertson, 2004; Spash, 2008).”
- Bulldozing biodiversity: The economics of offsets and trading-in Nature (2015, background): “I refer to this as part of a new environmental pragmatism (Spash, 2009) that is clearly identifiable in fields such as ecological economics (Spash, 2013; Spash and Ryan, 2012).”
- Protest response and willingness to pay for culturally significant urban trees: Implications for Contingent Valuation Method (2015, unknown): “However, the CVM has been criticized as methodologically flawed (Gatzweiler, 2014; Lo and Spash, 2013; Spash, 2008; Spash et al., 2009; Whitehead, 2014).”