The economies of online cooperation

By P. Kollock, Marc A. Smith. 2002

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f60e7d925c2acb2df06887b63bcc7c91df931315

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Sociology and Political Science

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Citations in the corpus

Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life (2011, background): “These included the idea of generalized exchange and gift economies (Kollock 1999; Mauss 1990), the notion of the information commons (Benkler 2006; Hardin 1969), and a concept of information “neighborhoods” extended from the work of Jacobs (1992).”
Through a Glass Darkly: Information Technology Design, Identity Verification, and Knowledge Contribution in Online Communities (2007, background): “…research on prosocial behavior in a virtual environment, people help strangers not only because of altruism, but also for reputation (Donath 1999, Wasko and Faraj 2005), future reciprocation (Ackerman 1998), and self-esteem (Bock et al. 2005, Wasko and Faraj 2005, Hertel et al. 2003, Kollock 1999).”
The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities (2001, background): “The decision to change platform is not based on blind idealism, but because of bad experiences with the existing equipment.”
Different Roles, Different Strokes: Organizing Virtual Customer Environments to Promote Two Types of Customer Contributions (2010, background): “…Nahapiet and Ghoshal 1998, Podsakoff and MacKenzie 1994), suggests that an individual’s relationships with other members elicits a sense of obligation and duty that drives participation (Kollock 1999, Franke and Shah 2003, Lakhani and von Hippel 2003, Constant et al. 1996, Wasko and Faraj 2005).”
Voluntary Engagement in an Open Web-Based Encyclopedia: Wikipedians and Why They Do It (2009, result): “For the measured engagement of Wikipedia contributors, the four components of the Klandermans Model together accounted for a partial R2 D .13, or 46% of the total explained variance.”
Knowledge sharing and social media: Altruism, perceived online attachment motivation, and perceived online relationship commitment (2014, background): “…described as a form of unconditional kindness without the expectation of a return (Fehr & Gächter, 2000), providing help and achieving a sense of satisfaction from the action (Kollock, 1999), and helping others regardless of whether anything is received in return (Davenport & Prusak, 2000).”
What We Know and Don't Know about Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature (2014, background): “As Kollock (1999, p 228) suggests, “… high quality information, impressive technical details in one's answers, a willingness to help others, and elegant writing can all work to increase one's prestige in the community ” (in the offline world, status and reputation are buttressed by other resources,…”
Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? (2017, methodology): “Over the years, U&G framework has been commonly employed in understanding user motives for media use: radio (Herzog, 1940; 1944), Usenet discussions (Kollock, 1999), online communities (Dholakia, Bagozzi, & Pearo, 2004), and Wikipedia (Nov.”
Motivations to participate in online communities (2010, methodology): “Kollock applied this theory to the production of open source software, and defined reputational benefits and learning as motivations that overcome that trend [13].”
Motivations for sharing information and social support in social media: A comparative analysis of Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, YouTube, and Flickr (2015, background): “Generalized reciprocity has been found to be one of the important factors that motivates people to participate in knowledge sharing in various types of virtual communities (Davenport & Prusak, 1998; Jarvenpaa & Staples, 2000; Kollock, 1999; Wasko & Faraj, 2005).”