Reconceptualizing Compatability Beliefs in Technology Acceptance Research

By Elena Karahanna, Ritu Agarwal, Corey M. Angst. MIS Q., 2006

634 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5966a113a306d8f98bbd6adf7c05772cb5d4175

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Shackled to the Status Quo: The Inhibiting Effects of Incumbent System Habit, Switching Costs, and Inertia on New System Acceptance (2012, positive): “Perceived Ease of Use (Karahanna et al. 2006; Venkatesh et al. 2003) GDPEOU1 I would find Google Docs easy to use for collaborating / sharing files with teammates.”
Predicting SMEs' adoption of enterprise systems (2009, background): “A recent study by Karahanna et al. (2006) suggests revisiting the compatibility construct.”
Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning (2013, background): “Karahanna, Agarwal, and Angst (2006) extend TAM with the construct of compatibility that originally developed as part of innovation diffusion theory (Rogers, 1995).”
Augmenting the Technology Acceptance Model with Trust: Commercial Drivers’ Attitudes towards Monitoring and Feedback (2012, result): “In line with the TAM, the results demonstrated that perceived usefulness is the most important determinant of intention to use the OBMS.”
Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to assess automation (2011, background): “…such, many researchers have used this framework and have added new constructs and relationships to describe user acceptance (for examples, see Bajaj and Nidumolu 1998; Dishaw and Strong 1999; Gefen et al. 2003; Karahanna et al. 2006; Venkatesh and Davis 2000; Venkatesh et al. 2003; Yi et al. 2006).”
A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research (2014, background): “(e.g., Karahanna et al. 2006, Taylor and Todd 1995).”
The Formation and Value of IT-Enabled Resources: Antecedents and Consequences of Synergistic Relationships (2010, background): “Recently, Karahanna et al. (2006) reiterated the importance of removing needs from the discussion of compatibility.”
Conceptualizing models using multidimensional constructs: a review and guidelines for their use (2012, background): “Although dimension sets appear in IS research (e.g., Karahanna et al, 2006), there is an ongoing discourse about their usefulness in the broader methods literature.”