Fair-Market Ideology: Its Cognitive-Motivational Underpinnings

By John T. Jost, S. Blount, Jeffrey Pfeffer, G. Hunyady. 2003

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f58b4c5e5295979610842d6cf6d0cbb3fff9e862

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. John T. Jost
2. Jaime L. Napier
3. Christopher M. Federico
4. Tom Tyler
5. Joanna Sterling
6. Gordon Pennycook
7. Eran Halperin
8. David G. Rand

In Safety Research

1. Jaime L. Napier
2. Tom Tyler
3. Gordon Pennycook
4. John T. Jost
5. David de Cremer
6. Thomas Bauwens
7. Hongwei He
8. S. Grover

In Sociology and Political Science

1. John T. Jost
2. Jaime L. Napier
3. Christopher M. Federico
4. Tom Tyler
5. Joanna Sterling
6. Gordon Pennycook
7. Eran Halperin
8. Aaron C. Kay

Citations in the corpus

• Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities. (2009, methodology): “The discursive superstructure refers to the network of socially constructed attitudes, values, and beliefs bound up with a particular ideological position at a particular time and place ( Jost et al. 2003c).”
• Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit? (2016, background): “Psychological and polit- ical orientation — the left, the right, and the rigid: Comment on Jost et al. (2003).”
• Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. (2006, background): “Belief in the procedural justice of markets is widespread within American society, even among those who benefit the least from their operation (Jost et al. 2003).”