Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation.
By Tom Tyler. Annual Review of Psychology, 2006
2,195 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9fef5ae450aa57d1cf12072437c9a6ac0986eef4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- John T. Jost
- Jaime L. Napier
- B. Bradford
- J. Jackson
- J. Toorn
- Scott S. Wiltermuth
- Christopher M. Federico
- Tom Tyler
In Social Psychology
- John T. Jost
- Adam M. Grant
- D. Cornell
- Maarten Vansteenkiste
- Timothy R. Konold
- Richard M. Ryan
- Frank Martela
- Jaime L. Napier
In Sociology and Political Science
- John T. Jost
- Tom Tyler
- J. Jackson
- B. Bradford
- Jaime L. Napier
- Devon Johnson
- Christopher M. Federico
- Wesley G. Skogan
Citations in the corpus
- Compliance Theory: A Goal Framing Approach (2011, background): “…be a combination of material, emotional and normative goals at play in compliance and noncompliance behaviors (e.g., Fisman and Miguel 2007; Parker 2006, 1999; Tyler 2006; May 2005; Wenzel 2005, 2004; Haines and Gurney 2003; Gezelius 2002; Simpson 2002; Hutter 2001; Alm, Sanchez, and De Juan 1995).”
- Procedural justice, legitimacy, and prisoner misconduct (2009, background): “Tyler (2006b) contends that obligation measures more directly reflect an individual’s motivation to comply with the law, whereas support scales require researchers to infer that the link between support and compliance is a product of an internalized sense of obligation to obey legal authorities’…”
- Striking Out: Race and Support for Police Use of Force (2009, background): “ant on police powers (Tyler, 2006).”
- Legitimacy through CSR disclosures? The advantage outweighs the disadvantages (2016, background): “In line with this, we define legitimacy, by referring to ost (2011), as an individual’s perception or attitude as to how a company attempts to reach desirable goals or outcomes instrumental dimension), how it treats others with dignity and respect (relational dimension), and how it acts consistent i”
- FROM SUPPORT TO MUTINY: SHIFTING LEGITIMACY JUDGMENTS AND EMOTIONAL REACTIONS IMPACTING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RADICAL CHANGE (2014, background): “Legitimacy has long been recognized as a vital resource for power-holders looking to develop and maintain authority and extract high-quality compliance from their subordinates (Beetham, 1991; Tyler, 2006; Zelditch, 2001).”
- The role of place identity and place attachment in breaking environmental protection laws (2010, methodology): “In addition to the identification processes, Wenzel’s and Frı́as-Armenta et al.’s studies focus on variables that are relevant to the explanation of compliance with ordinary laws (Tyler, 2006a), such as deterrence variables, and social and personal norms (see also Martı́n, Hernández, & Ruiz, 2007).”
- Combining Psychology and Economics in the Analysis of Compliance: From Enforcement to Cooperation (2012, background): “If one party is trusted, the other party will assist this party to fulfill its aims, thereby increasing its power (Tyler, 2006).”
- A bed of thorns: Female leaders and the self-reinforcing cycle of illegitimacy (2016, background): “…almost exclusively on research that has examined the specific case of bias against women in powerful positions that entail control over others, and we integrate this work with a different stream of research centered on the legitimacy of power-holders (Magee & Frasier, 2014; Tyler, 2002, 2006).”
- Community Perceptions of Police Body-Worn Cameras (2017, neutral): “Tyler, T. R. (2006).”
- Reoffending After Release (2016, background): “Legitimacy is the belief that authorities and institutions are appropriate and just, and, therefore, are entitled to be obeyed (Tyler, 1990, 1997, 2006).”
- Contact and confidence: revisiting the impact of public encounters with the police (2009, methodology): “The procedural justice model focuses on the relationships between procedural fairness, legitimacy, cooperation with the police and compliance with the law (Lind and Tyler 1988, Tyler and Huo 2002, Sunshine and Tyler 2003a,b, Tyler 1990, 2004, 2006).”
- Authoritative school discipline: High school practices associated with lower bullying and victimization. (2010, background): “Adolescents are more willing to accept and trust school authority if they perceive rule enforcement to be fair (Tyler, 2006).”
- Public Confidence in Policing: A Neo-Durkheimian Perspective (2007, neutral): “The legitimacy of the police is currently attracting considerable interest in policy circles and the social sciences (Hough, 2003, 2004b, 2006; Tyler, 2006; Reiner, 2006).”