Historical and Personality Correlates to the Violence Patterns of Juveniles Tried as Adults

By I. Kruh, P. J. Frick, Carl B. Clements. 2005

272 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f3ffac636021779649a94288f5e3d8afa1991679

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. P. J. Frick
2. K. Fanti
3. Stuart F. White
4. E. Kimonis
5. Monica A. Marsee
6. S. Georgiou
7. C. Essau
8. J. Skeem

Citations in the corpus

• Callous-unemotional features, behavioral inhibition, and parenting: independent predictors of aggression in a high-risk preschool sample (2006, background): “As found in older samples, these features were associated with more aggression overall and with greater proactive aggression specifically (Frick, Cornell, Barry, et al., 2003; Kruh, Frick, & Clements, 2005 ).”
• Linking Callous-Unemotional Traits to Instrumental and Non-Instrumental Forms of Aggression (2009, background): “…CU traits are associated with a combination of instrumental and non-instrumental forms of aggression are consistent with several previous studies (Frick et al. 2003; Kruh et al. 2005), indicating that CU traits are related to a more severe pattern of antisocial behavior (Frick and Dickens 2006).”
• The Peer Relationships of Youths With Psychopathic Personality Traits (2008, background): “Consistent with research on adjudicated youth (Kruh et al., 2005), youths who were stably high on psychopathic traits (M = 0.17 and M = –0.12 for boys and girls, respectively) were more violent than those who were stably low (M = –0.16 and M = –0.21 for boys and girls, respectively), and this…”
• Assessing callous-unemotional traits in adolescent offenders: validation of the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits. (2008, background): “The self-report format has been the most widely used version in adolescent samples and scores from this scale have designated more severe and violent groups of juvenile offenders (Caputo, Frick, & Brodsky, 1999; Kruh et al., 2005), have been associated with an early onset of offending (Silverthorn, ”
• Instrumentally Violent Youths (2007, methodology): “Using the Antisocial Process Screening Device (Frick & Hare, 2001) to measure psychopathic traits, Kruh, Frick, and Clements (2005) reported that young adults who committed unprovoked aggression exhibited more psychopathic traits compared with those who committed aggression in response to…”
• Can callous-unemotional traits enhance the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of serious conduct problems in children and adolescents? A comprehensive review. (2014, unknown): “3 Kruh et al. (2005) N 100; age 16–21; 100% male; forensic sample.”
• The importance of callous-unemotional traits for developmental models of aggressive and antisocial behavior (2008, background): “Further, this group is less likely to be aggressive than the group with CU traits but, when they are aggressive, it is often confined to reactive forms of aggression (Frick et al., 2003a; Kruh et al., 2005).”
• Research review: the importance of callous-unemotional traits for developmental models of aggressive and antisocial behavior. (2008, background): “…has great potential for explaining the causes of the most severe and aggressive patterns of antisocial behavior displayed by youth and that use of these traits to subtype antisocial youth could help to integrate many of the past attempts for defining distinct groups of antisocial youth.”
• Callous-Unemotional Traits in a Community Sample of Adolescents (2006, methodology): “The ability of CU traits to designate a more severe group of antisocial youth has been found (a) in adolescent (Caputo et al., 1999; Kruh et al., 2005; Marsee et al., in press; Vincent et al., 2003) and preadolescent samples (Christian et al., 1997; Frick, Cornell, Barry, et al., 2003); (b) in…”