Comparison of Peer Coaching Versus Traditional Supervision Effects

By C. Bowman, S. McCormick. 2000

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f3f5f202d3fe79ff8529dddd4f470aa1f1233e10

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Preservice Teachers' Observations of Cooperating Teachers and Peers While Participating in an Early Field Experience (2005, background): “…of additional positive effects: (1) participants have increased their effective teaching behaviors while simultaneously reducing ineffective ones (Bowman & McCormick, 2000; Hudson, Miller, Salzburg, & Morgan, 1994; Kromrey & Wynn, 1999; Kurtts, 1997; Lignuris/Kraft & Marchand-Martella, 1993;…”
Does coaching, mentoring, and supervision matter for pre-service teachers’ planning skills and clarity of instruction? A meta-analysis of (quasi-)experimental studies (2021, background): “Following the influence analyses, we detected two extreme outliers which both exceeded the SDRs limit (Goker, 2006, z ¼ 2.18; Bowman & McCormick, 2000, z ¼ 2.65, see Online Appendix Figure A2).”
Characteristics and Consequences of Adult Learning Methods and Strategies (2009, background): “16Practical Evaluation Reports Volume Two, Number One, March 2009 Appendix A Number of Study Participants and Learner Characteristics and Outcomes Study Sample Sizea Adult Learning Methodc Learner Description Setting Learner OutcomeE C Anderson & Render (1987) Study 1 Anderson & Render (1987) Study ”
How can Coaching Make a Positive Impact Within Educational Settings (2013, background): “Peer coaching for pre-service teachers has been shown to improve instructional skills (Hasbrouck, 1997; Mallette et al., 1999; Bowman & McCormick, 2000), enabled student teachers to focus on student learning rather than techniques for class room management (Jenkins et al., 2002), improved student…”
Student teachers' team teaching: Models, effects, and conditions for implementation (2014, background): “- 7 mentors - Primary education - Individual and focus group interviews with mentors - Observations - Field notes - Document review Qualitative No Gardiner and Robinson (2009) US Assistant teaching model, teaming model -”