Bullying At School What We Know And What We Can Do

By Can Do. 2016

2,505 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f3ef8f10f44524173cc130f91f61babecb0fbe6f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Perceptions of School Climate as a Function of Bullying Involvement (2014, background): “Bullying and Victimization Bullying refers to repeated acts of aggression intended to cause physical or psychological harm to a peer who cannot adequately defend against such attacks as a result of a power difference (Olweus, 1993).”
Conflictual student–teacher relationship, emotional and behavioral problems, prosocial behavior, and their associations with bullies, victims, and bullies/victims (2018, background): “Bullying is defined as the repetition in time of intentional aggressions directed at students who are weaker in their interactions with the bully or bullies (Jimerson, Swearer, & Espelage, 2010; Olweus, 1993; Olweus & Limber, 2010; Thornberg & Jungert, 2013).”
Cyberbullying Via Social Media (2015, background): “E-mail: rkowals@clemson.edu 11 whose relationship is characterized by a power imbalance (Kowalski et al., 2012, 2014; Olweus, 1993; Patchin & Hinduja, 2012).”
Workplace bullying, the development of job insecurity and the role of laissez-faire leadership: A two-wave moderated mediation study (2018, background): “Workplace bullying is commonly defined as ongoing exposure to negative acts that the target has difficulty defending him/herself against due to a real or perceived power imbalance between the parties (Einarsen, Hoel, Zapf, & Cooper, 2011; Olweus, 1993).”
From normative influence to social pressure: how relevant others affect whether bystanders join in cyberbullying (2016, methodology): “Respondents were provided with a definition of bullying, containing the key elements proposed by Olweus (1993): repetition, intention to hurt, and power imbalance.”
A Comparison of Classification Approaches for Cyberbullying and Traditional Bullying Using Data From Six European Countries (2015, background): “Thus, research questions were often inspired by what was already known about traditional bullying which is commonly defined as repeated, intentional aggressive behavior by a group or individual against a victim who cannot easily defend themselves (Olweus, 1993).”
Preventing Bullying Through Science, Policy, and Practice (2016, background): “Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29(3), 239-268. Son, E., Parish, S.L., and Peterson, N.A. (2012). National prevalence of peer victimization among young children with disabilities in the United States. Children and Youth Servic”
The Healthy Context Paradox: Victims’ Adjustment During an Anti-Bullying Intervention (2018, background): “Bullying is aggressive, systematic, and goal-directed behavior that harms individuals within the context of a power imbalance (Olweus 1993; Volk et al. 2014).”
What works in enhancing social and emotional skills development during childhood and adolescence? A review of the evidence on the effectiveness of school-based and out-of-school programmes in the UK. (2015, background): “, 2005) • The Emotional Control Questionnaire (Roger & Najarian, 1989) • The Bully / Victim Questionnaire (Olweus, 1993) • Locus of Control (Robinson et al.”
A Comparison of Preservice Teachers’ Responses to Cyber Versus Traditional Bullying Scenarios (2014, background): “Bullying is a subset of aggression that is characterized by a power imbalance in favor of perpetrators over victims, intention to cause harm or distress, and repetition of the behavior (Olweus, 1993).”
Preventing School Bullying: Should Schools Prioritize an Authoritative School Discipline Approach Over Security Measures? (2016, background): “Bullying generally includes a physical or psychological imbalance of power between the victim and the bully (Espelage et al., 2013; Olweus, 1993), and both bullies and victims are likely to suffer from serious shortand long-term repercussions.”
Bullying in schools: the state of knowledge and effective interventions (2017, background): “social exclusion, rumour spreading) (Monks & Smith, 2006; Olweus, 1993; Smith, 2014) up to the most recent forms of attacks through Internet and new technologies (also referred to as cyberbullying).”
What Makes a Young Assertive Bystander? The Effect of Intergroup Contact, Empathy, Cultural Openness, and In‐Group Bias on Assertive Bystander Intervention Intentions (2014, background): “Past research has shown that victims of bullying are often excluded by their peers (Olweus, 1993; Perry, et al., 1988) with immigrants identified as particularly vulnerable”
Bullying and Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis (2015, unknown): “30 Notably, there were fewer studies conducted in the United States, which could have influenced findings; additional US-based studies would allow for further consideration of the extent to which country influences the association between bullying and suicidality.”