Challenges in framing the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: the TEEB initiative

By I. Ring, B. Hansjürgens, T. Elmqvist, H. Wittmer, P. Sukhdev. 2010

221 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e716598af99024c975b2a5cd1eb21f43af27289d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Blue carbon: : Knowledge gaps, critical issues, and novel approaches (2014, background): “where should boundaries be drawn between ecological functions?) and fails to capture the complex reality of biotic and abiotic interactions, a consequence of which can be the focus on particular functions or species at the expense of others (Ring et al., 2010).”
A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning (2012, background): “Many investigaions still focus on a few selected ecosystem services and exclude rade-off analyses (Ring et al., 2010).”
A review on trade-off analysis of ecosystem services for sustainable land-use management (2016, background): “The underlying reason is that most studies have been focused on one or a few services without considering the interdependence and highly non-linear relationships among the ecosystem services (Ring et al., 2010).”
Beyond “benefits”? Looking at ecosystem services through the capability approach (2012, background): “, 2007; see also Minteer and Miller, 2011), or on strategic issues of including the value of nature in decision-making, in the light of apparent preference given to monetising approaches in political debates and the related advantages (Ring et al., 2010) and/or drawbacks (McCauley, 2006).”
The Ecosystem Services of Marine Aquaculture: Valuing Benefits to People and Nature (2018, background): “…Ecosystem service accounting and the TEEB initiative were established to provide a finance-based platform for quantifying nature’s goods and services, to draw attention to the crucial role biodiversity plays in global economic benefits and to the significance of its loss (Ring et al. 2010).”
The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective. (2017, background): “However, there is also a danger of oversimplification, reinventing the wheel, (non)deliberate misuse, or generating new, unforeseen trade-offs in decision-making (Bennett et al., 2009; Ring et al., 2010).”
Ecosystem services as technology of globalization: On articulating values in urban nature (2013, methodology): “, 2009), and The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity initiative (TEEB), hosted by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP; Ring et al., 2010).”