The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect Stands Up to Scrutiny.

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go from Here? (2008, background): “Despite Marsh’s (Marsh et al. 2004) argument to the contrary, discrepancies between the BFLPE paradigm and the social comparison literature are evident with respect to at least the following aspects of social comparison: a) Imposed vs.”
The Big-fish–little-pond-effect Stands Up to Critical Scrutiny: Implications for Theory, Methodology, and Future Research (2008, background): “In response to the Dai (2004) review, Marsh et al. (2004) demonstrated that: & Coupled with research reviewed by Marsh and Hau (2003), there is extremely strong support for internal validity, external validity, generalizability, and policypractice implications of the BFLPE (p. 269).”
A Challenge of Living? Understanding the Psycho-social Processes of the Child During Primary-secondary Transition Through Resilience and Self-esteem Theories (2008, background): “Marsh’s empirical studies into the ‘big-fish-little-pond’ effect (e.g. Marsh et al. 2004; Marsh and Hau 2003) highlight the importance of social comparisons on children’s self-judgments.”
Primary–secondary transition: Differences between teachers’ and children’s perceptions (2011, background): “Marsh’s empirical studies into the big-fish-little-pond effect (e.g. Marsh and Hau, 2003; Marsh et al., 2004) highlight the importance of social comparisons on children’s self-judgments.”