The sexual paradox : men, women, and the real gender gap
By S. Pinker. 2008
89 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f286299d1cfe9950c520f395eb75d2d8c8ec9fd4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- David C. Geary
- Nilanjana Dasgupta
- Gijsbert Stoet
- David Lubinski
- J. Rounds
- A. Eagly
- Denise Sekaquaptewa
- K. Hoff
Citations in the corpus
- Beyond the Threshold Hypothesis (2010, background): “…available evidence suggests that men and women gravitate to different career environments and career demands, on average, and that bias against women plays at most a minor role in sex differences in career outcomes (Ceci, Williams, & Barnett, 2009; National Academy of Sciences, 2010; Pinker, 2008).”
- Ingroup Experts and Peers as Social Vaccines Who Inoculate the Self-Concept: The Stereotype Inoculation Model (2011, background): “…who are talented and well qualified choose not to pursue particular high-achievement academic and professional paths and instead choose alternative paths that are more interesting to them (Ferriman, Lubinski, & Benbow, 2009; McArdle, 2008; Pinker, 2008; Rosenbloom, Ash, Dupont, & Coder, 2008).”
- Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. (2009, background): “This raises the question: Why do large sex differences continue to exist in these areas? Why are more women not represented in science and engineering fields? Debate over these STEM sex differences has been frequently highlighted in the media and has led to public debate (e.g., Dillon & Rimer, 2005;”
- The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (2018, result): “…greater realization of these potential sex differences in gender-equal nations is the opposite of what some scholars might expect intuitively, but it is consistent with findings for some other cognitive and social sex differences (e.g., Lippa, Collaer, & Peters, 2010; Pinker, 2008; Schmitt, 2015).”
- Sex differences in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 30 year examination (2010, background): “We should, of course, continue to equally encourage both women and men to pursue careers that they are passionate about (Pinker, 2008; Webb, Lubinski,&Benbow,2002),includinghighlevelcareersinSTEM.”