The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education

By Gijsbert Stoet, David C. Geary. Psychology Science, 2018

915 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/09548a530985e105b8c625eaf1eb7dd3baf630e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. H. Lawford-Smith
2. Steve Stewart-Williams
3. Victor Sojo
4. C. Fine
5. L. Halsey

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Steve Stewart-Williams
2. L. Halsey

In Safety Research

1. Steve Stewart-Williams
2. L. Halsey

Citations in the corpus

• Men, women and STEM: Why the differences and what should be done? (2020, methodology): “…2018), intimate partner violence (Schmitt, 2015), self-esteem (Zuckerman et al., 2016), spatial ability (Lippa et al., 2010), STEM graduation rates (Stoet & Geary, 2018), subjective wellbeing (Schmitt, 2015) and values (Falk & Hermle, 2018).16 Importantly, the pattern is also observed for…”
• Why Does Workplace Gender Diversity Matter? Justice, Organizational Benefits, and Policy (2019, background): “Nor is existing sex segregation of occupations, which can be greater in rich, industrialized nations that also score higher on gender equality indices (Charles, 2011; Stoet & Geary, 2018), strongly indicative that efforts to desegregate are pointless.”