Exploring Inner Experience: The descriptive experience sampling method

By R. T. Hurlburt, C. Heavey. 2006

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Cognitive Science & Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Cognitive Science & Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015, methodology): “Experience sampling studies of inner speech since then have largely been restricted to Hurlburt’s Descriptive Experience Sampling method, which is predicated on the bracketing of presuppositions about the frequency and form of inner experience (Hurlburt & Heavey, 2006).”
The Descriptive Experience Sampling method (2006, methodology): “Subjects use many words to signal this shift to the subjunctive: “It was like...”; “Maybe I was...”; “Well, I don’t know, but...”; “Probably I was....” Hurlburt and Heavey (2006) called such phrases ‘subjunctifiers.’”
Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior. (2012, unknown): “Experience sampling methodology and daily diary as discussed in this paper are different from descriptive experience sampling (Hurlburt, 2006).”
The varieties of inner speech: links between quality of inner speech and psychopathological variables in a sample of young adults. (2011, unknown): “It would therefore be desirable for future research to validate the VISQ using more ecologically valid methodologies, such as Experience Sampling Methods (ESM: Csikszentmihalyi & Larson, 1987) and Descriptive Experience Sampling (DES: Hurlburt & Heavey, 2006).”
Toward a phenomenology of inner speaking. (2013, unknown): “Descriptive Experience Sampling (DES; Hurlburt, 1993, 2011; Hurlburt & Akhter, 2006; Hurlburt & Heavey, 2006) subjects are asked to carry a random beeper as they go about their normal daily activities.”
Investigating pristine inner experience: implications for experience sampling and questionnaires. (2015, background): “Hurlburt and his colleagues have sought to investigate one particular class of phenomena that they refer to as pristine inner experience (Hurlburt, 2011; Hurlburt & Akhter, 2006; Hurlburt & Heavey, 2006; Hurlburt et al., 2013).”
Inner experience in the scanner: can high fidelity apprehensions of inner experience be integrated with fMRI? (2014, methodology): “A technique with the potential to offer an alternative method is descriptive experience sampling (DES; Hurlburt, 1993, 1997, 2011; Hurlburt and Heavey, 2001, 2002, 2006; Hurlburt and Akhter, 2006; Hurlburt and Schwitzgebel, 2007; Heavey and Hurlburt, 2008; Heavey et al., 2012; Hurlburt et al.,…”