Investigating pristine inner experience: implications for experience sampling and questionnaires.

By R. T. Hurlburt, C. Heavey. 2015

69 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Natural Language Processing, Philosophy

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Ben Alderson-Day
2. Charles Fernyhough
3. Simone Kühn
4. R. T. Hurlburt

In Natural Language Processing

1. Charles Fernyhough
2. Ben Alderson-Day
3. R. T. Hurlburt

In Philosophy

1. Ben Alderson-Day
2. Charles Fernyhough
3. Simone Kühn
4. R. T. Hurlburt

Citations in the corpus

• Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015, background): “The focus of these instruments has, however, been on the context and functions of self-talk, rather than its phenomenological properties, and they have not clearly discriminated between overt self-talk and inner speech (see Hurlburt & Heavey, 2015, for a critique).”
• Inner experience in the scanner: can high fidelity apprehensions of inner experience be integrated with fMRI? (2014, background): “This study should not be understood as saying that questionnaires about experience or non-DES experience sampling are valid descriptors of experience (Hurlburt and Heavey, 2014; Alderson-Day et al., in preparation; Hurlburt et al., in preparation).”