The Descriptive Experience Sampling method

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Inner experience in the scanner: can high fidelity apprehensions of inner experience be integrated with fMRI? (2014, methodology): “…technique with the potential to offer an alternative method is descriptive experience sampling (DES; Hurlburt, 1993, 1997, 2011; Hurlburt and Heavey, 2001, 2002, 2006; Hurlburt and Akhter, 2006; Hurlburt and Schwitzgebel, 2007; Heavey and Hurlburt, 2008; Heavey et al., 2012; Hurlburt et al., 2013).”
Toward a phenomenology of inner speaking. (2013, unknown): “Full descriptions of the method and considerations of DES are available elsewhere (Hurlburt, 2011; Hurlburt & Akhter, 2006; Hurlburt & Heavey, 2006; Hurlburt & Schwitzgebel, 2007).”
Degraded conditions: Confounds in the study of decision making (2014, unknown): “In agreement with N&S’s “immediacy” criterion, we suggest that what is needed in this type of case is introspection sampling, where people are cued at irregular intervals to report the contents of their conscious awareness (Hurlburt & Akhter 2006).”
Investigating pristine inner experience: implications for experience sampling and questionnaires. (2015, background): “Hurlburt and his colleagues have sought to investigate one particular class of phenomena that they refer to as pristine inner experience (Hurlburt, 2011; Hurlburt & Akhter, 2006; Hurlburt & Heavey, 2006; Hurlburt et al., 2013).”