Toward a phenomenology of inner speaking.

By R. T. Hurlburt, C. Heavey, Jason M. Kelsey. 2013

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Cognitive Science & Psychology, Philosophy

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Ben Alderson-Day
2. Charles Fernyhough
3. Simon McCarthy-Jones
4. R. T. Hurlburt
5. C. Heavey
6. Simone Kühn

In Social Psychology

1. Ben Alderson-Day
2. Charles Fernyhough
3. Simon McCarthy-Jones
4. R. T. Hurlburt
5. C. Heavey
6. Simone Kühn
7. Andrew Vincent
8. B. Brewer

In Cognitive Science & Psychology

1. Ben Alderson-Day
2. Charles Fernyhough
3. Simon McCarthy-Jones
4. R. T. Hurlburt
5. Simone Kühn
6. C. Heavey
7. Andrew Vincent
8. B. Brewer

In Philosophy

1. Ben Alderson-Day
2. Charles Fernyhough
3. Simone Kühn
4. R. T. Hurlburt
5. Andrew Vincent
6. C. Heavey
7. B. Brewer
8. J. V. Van Raalte

Citations in the corpus

• Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015, methodology): “Such methods are particularly valuable for investigating inner speech frequency, context dependence, and phenomenological properties, although their veridicality has often been questioned (for a recent example see Hurlburt et al., 2013).”
• Shot through with voices: Dissociation mediates the relationship between varieties of inner speech and auditory hallucination proneness (2014, methodology): “Respondents use a four-point scale (strongly agree, agree, disagree and strongly disagree) to classify evaluative statements about themselves, such as ‘‘On the whole, I am satisfied with myself’’.”
• Self-talk: Review and sport-specific model (2016, background): “…self-talk is u ed (Alderson-Day & Fernyhough, in press), why some people engage in self-talk almost constantly d others engage in self-talk extremely rarely (Hurlburt et al., 2013), and why some people perform better but others perform worse after using positive self-talk (Van Raalte et al., 2000).”
• Investigating pristine inner experience: implications for experience sampling and questionnaires. (2015, background): “Hurlburt and his colleagues have sought to investigate one particular class of phenomena that they refer to as pristine inner experience (Hurlburt, 2011; Hurlburt & Akhter, 2006; Hurlburt & Heavey, 2006; Hurlburt et al., 2013).”
• More than one voice: Investigating the phenomenological properties of inner speech requires a variety of methods☆ (2014, background): “, & Kelsey, Jason M. (2013). Toward a phenomenology of inner speaking.”
• Inner experience in the scanner: can high fidelity apprehensions of inner experience be integrated with fMRI? (2014, methodology): “…technique with the potential to offer an alternative method is descriptive experience sampling (DES; Hurlburt, 1993, 1997, 2011; Hurlburt and Heavey, 2001, 2002, 2006; Hurlburt and Akhter, 2006; Hurlburt and Schwitzgebel, 2007; Heavey and Hurlburt, 2008; Heavey et al., 2012; Hurlburt et al., 2013).”