Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis

By D. Cook. 2012

1,007 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training (2012, background): “Technological innovations, such as virtual reality simulation and e-learning applications, have led to consistent improvement in learning outcomes, and already play a role in surgical residency training programmes 1–3 .”
Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2013, methodology): “Most of the subgroup interactions evaluated in these reviews (Cook et al. 2011, 2012) varied from outcome to outcome and most were statistically non-significant.”
Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements (2016, methodology): “” [1] Another study found that only 3 % of studies incorporating debriefing in simulation education reported all the essential characteristics of debriefing [11].”
The NCSBN National Simulation Study: A Longitudinal, Randomized, Controlled Study Replacing Clinical Hours with Simulation in Prelicensure Nursing Education (2014, background): “Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the health care literature identify issues with a general lack of appropriately powered, rigorous studies (Cook et al., 2011; Issenberg, McGaghie, Petrusa, Gordon, & Scalese, 2005; Laschinger et al., 2008).”