Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training

By Maurits Graafland, J. Schraagen, Marlies P. Schijven. British Journal of Surgery, 2012

643 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Physiology, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b618635f70b7d880ea7ae9f8a02e3b703023fed6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Esther Z. Barsom
2. Marlies P. Schijven
3. Maurits Graafland
4. Ariel Cortes
5. Iouri Gorbanev
6. Oscar Mauricio Muñoz
7. Rafael A. Gonzalez
8. Sandra Agudelo-Londoño

In Physiology

1. Esther Z. Barsom
2. Marlies P. Schijven
3. Maurits Graafland
4. P. Guze

In Surgery

1. Esther Z. Barsom
2. Marlies P. Schijven
3. Maurits Graafland
4. P. Guze

Citations in the corpus

• Using Technology to Meet the Challenges of Medical Education. (2015, background): “The so-called “serious” games provide training tools that provide challenging stimulating environments, and are often used for training for future surgeons (8, 9, 10).”
• Systematic review on the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in medical training (2016, positive): “computer-enhanced training have been reported [6].”
• A systematic review of serious games in medical education: quality of evidence and pedagogical strategy (2018, background): “Trial and error in games has no fatal consequences, and it serves to build up professional skills and team work [3,11].”