The Challenge of Measuring Financial Impacts From Investments in Corporate Social Performance
By J. Peloza. 2009
721 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/efca4fe62c766d87cf724e57f9c2a863583981e9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Timo Busch
- Herman Aguinis
- Ante Glavas
- Stefan Lewandowski
- G. Friede
- Nicholas Nairn-Birch
- Ingo Kleindienst
- Sylvia Grewatsch
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Strategy and Management
- Timo Busch
- Ante Glavas
- Herman Aguinis
- G. Friede
- Stefan Lewandowski
- Ingo Kleindienst
- Sylvia Grewatsch
- Tobias Hahn
Citations in the corpus
- When Does It Pay to be Good? Moderators and Mediators in the Corporate Sustainability–Corporate Financial Performance Relationship: A Critical Review (2017, background): “Some of these reviews have focused on measurement and operationalization issues (Peloza 2009; van Beurden and Gössling 2008), some have focused on specific scholarly disciplines (Dixon-Fowler et al.”
- How does corporate social responsibility create value for consumers (2011, background): “Demonstrating the lack of consistency in CSR, Peloza (2009)”
- Performance evaluation and a flow allocation decision model for a sustainable supply chain of an apparel industry (2015, background): “Plambeck and Wang (2009) by analyzing two e-waste regulations (Fee-upon-sale versus fee-upondisposal) concluded that fee-upon-sale reduces the quantity of electronics produced and disposed by decreasing the frequency of launching new products.”
- Is Earnings Quality Associated with Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from the Korean Market (2019, background): “First of all, it has been widely examined how a corporation’s CSR performance is related to its financial performance (See Peloza [20] for review).”
- Corporate Social Performance and Firm Performance: Comparative Study among Developed and Emerging Market Firms (2019, background): “The empirical investigation of the CSP–CFP link requires reorientation to understand its specific dimensions [31,59,62].”
- Win–Win–Win: The Influence of Company‐Sponsored Volunteerism Programs on Employees, NGOs, and Business Units (2013, methodology): “…CSR initiatives and desired outcomes, meta-analyses have found that the CSR–organizational performance relationship can vary depending on the operationalization of CSR, the stakeholder being considered (Orlitzky et al., 2003; Peloza, 2009), and the methodology employed (Quazi & Richardson, 2012).”
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Moderating Role of Ownership Concentration in Turkey (2019, result): “Still, other studies showed no significant association between CSR and financial performance at all [14].”
- ISO 14001 certification and financial performance: selection-effect versus treatment-effect (2011, background): “Various arguments have been made regarding the relationship between firms’ social responsibility and their financial performance (Barnett and Salomon, 2006; Brammer and Millington, 2008; Margolis et al., 1997; Margolis and Walsh, 2003; McGuire et al., 1988; McWilliams and Siegel, 2000; Walsh et al.,”
- Sustainable Development and Financial Markets (2016, background): “Future research on sustainable investments may reach a more congruent picture by focusing more on disaggregated measures of corporate sustainability and analyzing the underlying moderating and mediating effects (Barnett, 2007; Busch & Hoffmann, 2011; Peloza, 2009; Schreck, 2011).”
- What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility (2012, methodology): “To avoid confusion given the different conceptualizations available (Carroll, 1999; Peloza, 2009; Waddock, 2004), we use the definition of CSR as offered by Aguinis (2011: 855) and adopted by others (e.g., Rupp, 2011; Rupp, Williams, & Aguilera, 2010): “context-specific organizational actions and…”
- The Robustness of the Corporate Social and Financial Performance Relation: A Second‐Order Meta‐Analysis (2018, background): “As an intermediate-outcome metric (Peloza, 2009), it reflects information that is closer to the value creation process within a firm and more remote to the variety of interacting and overlapping factors like discretionary accounting practices or general stock market movements (P.”
- Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance Revisited (2020, background): “Examples like this support the expectation that corporate carbon performance affects investors’ perceptions about future profitability, which is being captured by market-based performance measurements (DixonFowler et al., 2013; Peloza, 2009).”