Media Consumption and Perceptions of Social Reality: Effects and Underlying Processes
By L. Shrum. 2002
363 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Gender Studies, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef9f41b7806c741abf4a7033a0866a876f37a9cf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- Travis L. Dixon
- Patti M. Valkenburg
- Jochen Peter
- Cristina L. Azocar
- R. Lance Holbert
- Michael T. Stephenson
- Paul J. Wright
- Jaehoon Lee
In Gender Studies
- Jochen Peter
- Patti M. Valkenburg
- Paul J. Wright
- Travis L. Dixon
- Cristina L. Azocar
- Michael T. Stephenson
- R. Lance Holbert
- Rick W. Busselle
In Literature and Literary Theory
- Jochen Peter
- Patti M. Valkenburg
- Travis L. Dixon
- Rick W. Busselle
- James E. Burroughs
- A. Rindfleisch
- Cristina L. Azocar
- Michael T. Stephenson
Citations in the corpus
- Crime News and Racialized Beliefs: Understanding the Relationship Between Local News Viewing and Perceptions of African Americans and Crime (2008, background): “The most likely underlying mechanism for these effects includes increased accessibility of stereotypical constructs linking Blacks with violent crime as a result of frequent activation that results from local crime news viewing (Price & Tewksbury, 1997; Shrum, 1996, 2002 ).”
- An Online Process Model of Second-Order Cultivation Effects: How Television Cultivates Materialism and Its Consequences for Life Satisfaction. (2011, methodology): “This process is for the most part opposite of that by which television influences first-order judgments, in which television information influences judgments through its recall at the time the judgment is elicited, and not during the viewing process (Shrum, 2009).”
- Differential Susceptibility to Media Effects Model (2013, background): “All these response states have been identified in earlier media-effects theories (cognitive: Bandura, 2009; Lang, 2009; Petty et al., 2009; Shrum, 2009; emotional: Potter & Bolls, 2012; Slater & Rouner, 2002; and excitative: Anderson & Bushman, 2002).”
- Shaken and Stirred: A Content Analysis of Women’s Portrayals in James Bond Films (2010, background): “These messages may impact the viewing audience by presenting a limited view of the role of women in the world of international diplomacy, and in world culture generally (Shrum 2002).”
- The Importance of Indirect Effects in Media Effects Research: Testing for Mediation in Structural Equation Modeling (2003, methodology): “…of mediating variables in media research is evident in the discussion of various conditional influences found in some of the most influential theories or metaconcepts that drive mass communication research today (e.g., McCornbs & Reynolds, 2002; Petty, Priester, & Briiiol, 2002; Shrum, 2002).”
- Psychological Reactions to Crime News Portrayals of Black Criminals: Understanding the Moderating Roles of Prior News Viewing and Stereotype Endorsement (2006, background): “The automatic utilization of the construct in judgment will commence unless the viewer is not motivated or is unable to inhibit its use (Bargh, 1999; Bargh, Chen, & Burrows, 1996; Devine, 1989; Shrum, 2002).”
- Media Effects on Body Image: Examining Media Exposure in the Broader Context of Internal and Other Social Factors (2012, background): “The phrase “heuristic processing” suggests thatpeople tend to seek out small amounts of readily accessibleinformation when making quick judgments, rather than systematically searching their memories (Shrum, 2009).”
- Media Exposure and Exemplar Accessibility (2003, background): “First, two particular theories of media effects— exemplification theory (Zillmann, 2002; Zillmann & Brosius, 2000) and the heuristic processing theory of cultivation effects (Shrum, 2002)—are based partly on the notion that the ease with which media exemplars come to mind can account for some of the”
- Influence of Mass Media on Body Image and Eating Disordered Attitudes and Behaviors in Females: A Review of Effects and Processes (2010, background): “Television, magazines, films, billboards, and the like frequently offer a distorted vision of the world (Bercedo Sanz et al., 2005; Shrum, 2009), and it may be difficult for children and adolescents to distinguish whether what they see is real or not, so that they are more vulnerable to the messages”
- Priming Crime and Activating Blackness: Understanding the Psychological Impact of the Overrepresentation of Blacks as Lawbreakers on Television News (2007, background): “This activation would also occur automatically outside of conscious awareness as a result of chronic activation (Bargh, 1999; Devine, 1989; Shrum, 2002).”
- Perspectives of LGBTQ emerging adults on the depiction and impact of LGBTQ media representation (2017, background): “Media consumption may be defined diversely, including by means of ‘frequency, recency, or… content’ (Shrum 2009, 53).”
- Media Use and Public Perceptions of DNA Evidence (2010, background): “Given previous findings that priming respondents to think about media can either reduce cultivation effects (Shrum, 2002) or magnify such effects (Shanahan & Morgan, 1999), supplementary analyses estimated the models from Table 2 in two subsamples: respondents who were asked the media questions firs”
- Mass Media Effects on Youth Sexual Behavior Assessing the Claim for Causality (2011, background): “Systematic processing is inhibited when people lack the ability or motivation to engage in systematic behavioral analysis (Shrum, 2009).”
- Some Like It Bad: Testing a Model for Perceiving and Experiencing Fictional Characters (2005, background): “fer to Shapiro and McDonald (1992), Busselle (2001), Shrum (2002) , Hoorn et al. (2003), and Shapiro and Chock (2003).”
- Organizations Behaving Badly: When Are Discreditable Actions Likely to Damage Organizational Reputation? (2010, background): “In doing so, they help to shape perceptions of what is new and newsworthy (McQuail, 1984; Schudson, 1978), and to influence external stakeholders’ judgments of what behaviors are normal or abnormal (Shrum, 2002).”