Media Exposure and Exemplar Accessibility

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Addictive Potential of Television Binge Watching: Comparing Intentional and Unintentional Binges (2017, methodology): “In this study, GPA (i.e., Grade Point Average) was used as an approximation of intelligence (M 3.29, SD 0.47), consistent with previous research demonstrating using GPA as an indicator of cognitive abilities (Busselle & Shrum, 2003; O’Guinn & Shrum, 1997).”
An Online Process Model of Second-Order Cultivation Effects: How Television Cultivates Materialism and Its Consequences for Life Satisfaction. (2011, background): “…of television information from memory, the accessibility bias that results from frequent television viewing (e.g., Bradley, 2007; Busselle, 2001; Busselle & Shrum, 2003; Shrum, 1996; Shrum & O’Guinn, 1993), and the use of meta-cognitive experiences such as accessibility in judgment construction…”
Crime Cultivation: Comparisons Across Media Genres and Channels (2007, background): “Finally, information processing theories have recently surfaced in research efforts to parse out the relations between TV viewing and crime orientations (e.g., Busselle, 2001; Busselle & Shrum, 2003; Mares, 1996; Shrum, 1996, 2001; Shrum & O’Guinn, 1993; Shrum, Wyer, & O’Guinn, 1998).”