Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of Warwick
By Robert G. Dyson. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004
768 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eea3c0b07423dc95d202cd46507a291e03f718cf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Mandana Azadegan-Mehr
- Gary Brian Wills
- Sepehr Ghazinoory
- Valerie Belton
- Richard M. Crowder
- John C. Mingers
- Sony Jalarajan Raj
- Mushfiqur Rahman
In Strategy and Management
- Mandana Azadegan-Mehr
- Sepehr Ghazinoory
- Valerie Belton
- John C. Mingers
- Sony Jalarajan Raj
- Mushfiqur Rahman
- Abdulaziz Elwalda
- Mathew Abraham
Citations in the corpus
- Swot Methodology: A State-of-the-Art Review for the Past, A Framework for the Future (2011, methodology): “Although this analysis seems out of date in comparison with recent approaches such as resource-based planning and competency-based planning Dyson (2004) pointing out the relation between SWOT and two above approaches could show that SWOT is such a fl exible framework which can combine with newer met”
- Strategy tools as boundary objects (2009, background): “Sharing strategic information tends to occur within communicative episodes, such as discussions in strategy workshops (Dyson, 2004; Hodgkinson et al., 2006).”
- A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science (2010, background): “This is a rational view of strategy and depends on the analysis of environmental opportunity and threats, and the strengths and weaknesses of the organisations (Dyson, 2000a, 2000b; Dyson, 2004).”
- Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations (2017, methodology): “Fourthly, SWOT supports developing new strategies or alternatives using a TOWS matrix (Weihrich, 1982, Dyson, 2004), which confronts the elements of internal quadrants (Strengths/Weaknesses) with those of external quadrants (Opportunities/Threats; (e.g. Terrados et al., 2009, Sevkli et al., 2012).”
- SWOT analysis applications: An integrative literature review (2021, methodology): “It helps managers to formulate competitive strategies in their business environments (De Boer et al., 2001; Dyson, 2004; Feglar et al., 2006; Ho et al., 2010; Kajanuset al., 2012).”
- A Qualitative Review of Literature on Peer Review of Teaching in Higher Education (2014, methodology): “Third, even though the SWOT is acknowledged as an established method for the formulation of strategies (Dyson, 2004), as it simplifies complex issues into manageable tasks, researchers also suggest the use of alternative methods or tools in tandem with SWOT in strategy analysis (Helms & Nixon,…”
- Importance-Performance Analysis based SWOT analysis (2016, background): “Whereas Opportunities and Threats are the external (uncontrollable) factors that enable and disable organizations from accomplishing their mission (Dyson, 2004).”