A Qualitative Review of Literature on Peer Review of Teaching in Higher Education

By Susan Thomas, Q. Chie, Mathew Abraham, Sony Jalarajan Raj, Loo-See Beh. 2014

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Media Technology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1841780c62b30f40b86dc2fdf9f06820209b9f7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Media Technology

1. Ismail Erkan

Citations in the corpus

• SWOT analysis applications: An integrative literature review (2021, background): “Based on the internal and external factors, managers can develop four strategies, these are SO (strengths - opportunities), ST (strengths - threats), WO (weakness - opportunities) and WT (weakness threats) (Bayram & Üçüncü, 2016; David et al., 2019; Povilanskas & Labuz, 2012; Thomas et al., 2014; Us”
• Evaluating and enhancing quality in higher education teaching practice: a meta- review (2020, background): “Amongst reviews of peer review methods, there was strong consensus that a key beneficiary of the peer review process was the person(s) conducting the reviews (Chalmers and Hunt 2016; Crisp et al. 2009; McKenzie and Parker 2011; Thomas et al. 2014).”