Statistical Techniques Employed in AERJ and JCP Articles from 1988 to 1997: A Methodological Review

By K. M. Kieffer, R. J. Reese, B. Thompson. 2001

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed9c2b5bacf4413efe75f8ec6b90125cccce2027

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

How to Estimate and Interpret Various Effect Sizes (2004, background): “However, empirical studies of reporting practices indicate that in a surprising number of studies, authors report effects without clearly indicating exactly which effect is being presented ( Kieffer, Reese, & Thompson, 2001; Vacha-Haase et al., 2000).”
Reliability of Bidimensional Acculturation Scores (2009, background): “For example, although it has been suggested that researchers report reliability estimates for each unique measurement (Wilkinson & the APA Task Force on Statistical Inference, 1999), reviews of reporting practices have shown that reliability reporting varies across entire journal volumes ( Kieffer, ”
A primer on multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) for behavioral scientists (2014, methodology): “Regardless of the choice of post hoc method, researchers should completely avoid using univariate methods after rejecting a multivariate null hypothesis (Huberty & Morris, 1989; Kieffer et al., 2001; Tonidandel & LeBreton, 2013; Zientek & Thompson, 2009).”
STUDY QUALITY IN SLA (2013, methodology): “The analyses required to answer my research questions were relatively straightforward and similar to reviews of quantitative research practices in other fi elds (e.g., Goodwin & Goodwin, 1985 ; Kieffer et al., 2001 ; Willson, 1980 ).”
Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from Correlational Research for Evidence-Based Practice (2005, methodology): “IN A P P R O P R I AT E UN I VA R I AT E ME T H O D S Univariate methods (i.e., analyses using a single dependent variable) are quite commonly used in educational research (Kieffer et al., 2001).”
Performing Multivariate Group Comparisons Following a Statistically Significant MANOVA (2003, background): “However, subsequent content analyses of published studies (e.g., Keselman et al., 1998; Kieffer et al., 2001) indicate that researchers routinely think univariately when conducting follow-ups of statistically significant MAN OVA effects, despite admonitions from methodologists about such analytic be”
Matrix Summaries Improve Research Reports: Secondary Analyses Using Published Literature (2009, background): “Notwithstanding the fact that about three quarters of published MANOVA articles incorrectly report post hoc ANOVAs (Kieffer et al., 2001), “one would usually be well advised to follow up a significant multivariate test with a [descriptive] discriminant function analysis in order to study the nature ”
Confidence Intervals for Effect Sizes in Analysis of Variance (2002, methodology): “For analyses restricted to the finite but often large set of all subset comparisons, CCs based on critical values produced by Monte Carlo methods by Klockars and Hancock (1998) (the square roots of the values in their Table 2) provide a modest decrease in confidence interval width and therefore a mo”
A Review of Methodological Characteristics of Research Published in Key Journals in Higher Education: Implications for Graduate Research Training (2004, unknown): “Similarly, Kieffer et al. (2001) found only 50% of articles in AERJ and JCP correctly reported information on score reliability, which was somewhat higher than the 31% in our study.”