A Review of Methodological Characteristics of Research Published in Key Journals in Higher Education: Implications for Graduate Research Training

By S. Hutchinson, Cheryl D. Lovell. 2004

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Academic entrepreneurship (re)defined: significance and implications for the scholarship of higher education (2010, background): “Finally, it is important to state that academic journals serve an important function within most disciplines by offering a mechanism by which professionals communicate ideas, stimulate discussion (as well as controversy), and share information ( Hutchinson and Lovell 2004 ).”
A Continuation of the Paradigm Wars? Prevalence Rates of Methodological Approaches Across the Social/Behavioral Sciences (2010, methodology): “Niglas (2004), and to a lesser extent Hutchinson and Lovell (2004), followed this method of providing precise operational definitions of the methods indicators coded.”
Critical Appraisal of Mixed Methods Studies (2013, unknown): “…sciences (Alise & Teddlie, 2010; Collins, Onwuegbuzie, & Sutton, 2006; Creswell, 2003; Fidel, 2008; Greene, 2007; Hart, Smith, Swars, & Smith, 2009; Hurmerinta-Peltomaki & Nummela, 2006; Hutchinson & Lovell, 2004; Johnson & Onwuegbuzie, 2004; Tashakkori & Creswell, 2007; Truscott et al., 2010).”