Organization of the mitotic chromosome

By N. Naumova, Maxim Imakaev, Geoffrey Fudenberg, Y. Zhan, B. Lajoie, Leonid A. Mirny, Job Dekker. Science, 2013

943 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Chromosome Conundrum The three-dimensional organization of chromosomal DNA within the cell nucleus plays an important role in gene regulation. Naumova et al. (p. 948, published online 7 November; see the Perspective by Kleckner et al.) used chromosome conformation capture-based methods in human tissue culture cells to analyze the higher order folding of human chromosomes across the cell cycle. During interphase the chromosomes showed locus-specific compart-mentalization. In mitotic cells, on the other hand, the chromosome organization was more linear, consistent with arrays of consecutive chromatin loops. Chromosome conformation changes dramatically during the cell cycle and is unlikely to carry epigenetic information. [Also see Perspective by Kleckner et al.] Mitotic chromosomes are among the most recognizable structures in the cell, yet for over a century their internal organization remains largely unsolved. We applied chromosome conformation capture methods, 5C and Hi-C, across the cell cycle and revealed two distinct three-dimensional folding states of the human genome. We show that the highly compartmentalized and cell type–specific organization described previously for nonsynchronous cells is restricted to interphase. In metaphase, we identified a homogenous folding state that is locus-independent, common to all chromosomes, and consistent among cell types, suggesting a general principle of metaphase chromosome organization. Using polymer simulations, we found that metaphase Hi-C data are inconsistent with classic hierarchical models and are instead best described by a linearly organized longitudinally compressed array of consecutive chromatin loops.

Subfields: Cell Biology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed31b9adb1c3acb1a8f4b92b5ae58abceb56f1d2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cell Biology

  1. Richard A. Young
  2. C. Haering
  3. J. Peters
  4. Mihai Pop
  5. Denes Hnisz
  6. W. Earnshaw
  7. Kim Nasmyth

In Molecular Biology

  1. Richard A. Young
  2. Leonid A. Mirny
  3. Denes Hnisz
  4. Adam M. Phillippy
  5. Nezar Abdennur
  6. Sergey Koren
  7. Tong Ihn Lee
  8. Brian Walenz

Citations in the corpus