Examining Rival Models of Leisure Coping Mechanisms

By Yoshitaka Iwasaki. 2003

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ec583c2102235c2d4c1b7f0f1c4372aac0e6ba4d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Coping: An Alternative Conceptualization for Constraint Negotiation and Accommodation (2007, background): “For example, research that has examined leisure coping mechanisms (Iwasaki, 2003) and investigated the behavioral and cognitive coping responses associated with different levels of reported stress (Miller & McCool, 2003) can subsequently be applied to enhance leisure constraint models.”
Moderating effects of Job Relevance and Experience on mobile wireless technology acceptance: Adoption of a smartphone by individuals (2008, methodology): “The chi-square was not used because it is sensitive to sample size [11].”
Leisure as a coping resource: A test of the job demand-control-support model (2009, background): “As well, an increasing number of researchers are promoting how important leisure is to understanding job stress and coping strategies (Haworth & Lewis, 2005; Schneider & Iwasaki, 2003; Trenberth & Dewe, 2002), which is an important objective of this article.”
Investigating mobile wireless technology adoption: An extension of the technology acceptance model (2009, methodology): “Ubiquity represents a definitive form of spatial, temporal, and contextual mobility (Junglas and Watson 2003). Sarker and Wells (2003) claimed that the most touted advantage of MWT might be the ability to enable anytime, anywhere communication, collaboration, and commerce.”
Its the little things that matter: an examination of knowledge workers energy management (2011, unknown): “Thus, they may be a type of positive diversion (Iwasaki, 2003).”