A multi-method evaluation of journals in the decision and management sciences by US academics

By Joan M. Donohue, Jeremy B. Fox. 2000

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management Information Systems, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ec55f196cad47d68d8fdabf6a0357cce37c9af6b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Judit Bar-Ilan
2. José M. Merigó

In Management Information Systems

1. Judit Bar-Ilan

In Statistics and Probability

1. José M. Merigó
2. Jianbo Yang
3. Judit Bar-Ilan
4. Ludo Waltman
5. Dongling Xu
6. Loet Leydesdorff
7. Michael Gusenbauer
8. John C. Mingers

Citations in the corpus

• A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science (2017, background): “Moreover, several studies have focused on more specific issue s, including the analysis of citation behaviour in OR-MS [30-33], institutions in INFORMS practice literature [14], the evaluation of OR-MS journals [8-10] and country ana lyses [21,37].”
• Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century - A review (2008, background): “DuBois and Reeb (2000) compared business journals according to the JIF, an adjusted JIF and the results of a survey of researchers in the area.”