A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science

648 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda (2021, background): “From an academic standpoint, it is significant to classify and synthesize the output of research in a specific field, so that those interested can follow the field’s developments and trends (Merigó and Yang 2017).”
A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Medical Big Data Research (2018, methodology): “Up to now, the bibliometrics has been widely used in hotspot research [15], co-authorship analysis [16], co-citation analysis [17], and the development of the whole subject ﬁelds [18].”
Forty years of the European Journal of Operational Research: A bibliometric overview (2017, background): “For a onger time-window that considers all the documents of the jour- als available in WoS, see Merigó and Yang (2017 ).”
Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? (2019, background): “According to Buela-Casal and Zych (2012), Leydesdorff (2012) and Merigó and Yang (2017), by considering only the impact factor index as selection criterion might be problematic, since some manipulations such as self-citations can be performed in order to increase the index.”