Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test
By N. Schmitt, Diane Schmitt, C. Clapham. 2001
1,292 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb26ed40f73d2ec68ab7ce08fe7a887aa2606920
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- N. Schmitt
- E. Peters
- Stuart Webb
- B. Laufer
- Lars Stenius Stæhr
- Parveneh Tavakoli
- Johannes Eckerth
- B. Fernández
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- N. Schmitt
- E. Peters
- Stuart Webb
- Parveneh Tavakoli
- Johannes Eckerth
- Lars Stenius Stæhr
- A. Pellicer‐Sánchez
- B. Fernández
Citations in the corpus
- The effects of word exposure frequency and elaboration of word processing on incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition through reading (2012, methodology): “As in Schmitt et al. (2001), part A of Pretest 1 asked the participants to tick either ‘I know the word’, ‘word is somewhat familiar’ or ‘don’t know the word’.”
- The idiom principle revisited (2014, methodology): “Words have traditionally been viewed as primary units of language acquisition in first and second language learning as is implicit in every vocabulary-based assessment of language development in both the L1 and L2, such as the popular Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, or PPVT (Dunn and Dunn 2007), an”
- Learning word pairs and glossed sentences: the effects of a single context on vocabulary knowledge (2007, background): “Their mean score was 27.1/30, indicating that they were well in control of that level, and that they had receptive knowledge of almost all of the 2000 most frequent words (Schmitt et al., 2001).”
- Extensive reading in a challenging environment: a comparison of extensive and intensive reading approaches in Saudi Arabia (2009, methodology): “a Vocabulary size: The Vocabulary Levels Test (VLT) (Schmitt et al., 2001) has been used in numerous studies to obtain a measure of the vocabulary size of second language learners, and is now as close to a standard test Table 1 List of graded readers used in the study”
- The Word Associates Format: Validation evidence (2011, background): “%) of the 2000 level vocabulary on the Vocabulary Levels Test, and mastery or near-mastery of the 3000 and Academic levels.”