From Management Systems to Corporate Social Responsibility

By G. Zwetsloot. 2003

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Corporate Social Responsibility: One Size Does Not Fit All. Collecting Evidence from Europe (2009, background): “…of consensus around one definition of CSR is not a lack of ingenuity or capacity of the experts: it can also be traced back to the different origins of this age-old concept where historical, cultural, and socio-economic factors, besides language, have been and still are playing a decisive role.”
Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP (2009, background): “SA 8000 has contributed to achieving higher social accountability and better employees’ quality of life (Robson et al., 2007; Rohitratana, 2002; Zwetsloot, 2003).”
Pride or Embarrassment? Employees’ Emotions and Corporate Social Responsibility (2015, background): “Zwetsloot (2003) highlight the importance of continuous learning related to management system development in regards to CSR.”
A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science (2010, background): “CSR demands that organisations and businesses manage the economic, social and environmental impacts of their operations in order to maximise the benefits and minimise the downsides for their stakeholders(Gregory and Midgley 2003; Zwetsloot 2003).”