Facial and Verbal Expressions in Assessing Stories and Topics

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The interactional management of claims of insufficient knowledge in English language classrooms (2013, background): “The assertion that an utterance like ‘I don’t know’ can be linked to preference organisation was also mentioned by Sacks (1987) and Pomerantz (1984b).”
The Embodied Turn in Research on Language and Social Interaction (2015, background): “For example, Ruusuvuori and Peräkylä (2009) examine the “temporal flexibility of the face” (p. 377) such that participants configure their facial expression and talk to display stance toward what is being told, often before any such verbal cues.”
Three orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations (2014, background): “…may involve interactional phenomena such as extreme case formulations (Pomerantz 1986), response cries (Goffman 1981; Heritage 2011; Couper-Kuhlen 2012), prosodic salience (Stevanovic 2012b), prominent facial expressions (Ruusuvuori & Peräkylä 2009), and laughter (Kovarsky, Curran, & Nichols 2009).”
The Embodied and Negotiated Production of Assessments in Instructed Actions (2009, background): “Her action and its effects are manifested by a range of multimodal resources (see the facial expressions described by Goodwin & Goodwin, 1987, and Ruusuvuori & Peräkylä, 2009/this issue): At the end of the dealer’s turn, she produces an eyebrow flash (4), then while she says ah d’accord (5) she…”