Difficulties Experienced by Education and Sociology Students in Quantitative Methods Courses
By Mari Murtonen, Erno Lehtinen. 2003
175 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb021d6ed0e53f329904dbbf4064005115d0dcde
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- University Students' Research Orientations: Do negative attitudes exist toward quantitative methods? (2005, methodology): “This result agrees with the findings of Murtonen and Lehtinen (2003), that Finnish education, sociology, and social policy students did not differ in the difficulties experienced on research methodology courses.”
- Can You Really Measure That? Combining Critical Race Theory and Quantitative Methods (2018, background): “Finally, strong teaching and graduate school preparation are essential, yet lacking, for quality use of QMs across educational fields (Henson, Hull, & Williams, 2010; Murtonen & Lehtinen, 2010), and possibly by extension also in CRT research.”
- Interest-based text preference moderates the effect of text difficulty on engagement and learning (2015, background): “Additionally, research methods are often associated with negative affective states (i.e., anxiety, frustration) and feelings of low self-efficacy (Murtonen & Lehtinen, 2003; Papanastasiou & Zembylas, 2008).”
- REVISITING A 90-YEAR-OLD DEBATE: THE ADVANTAGES OF THE MEAN DEVIATION (2005, background): “Students are simply taught that they should use it, but in social science most opt not to use numeric analysis at all anyway (Murtonen and Lehtinen, 2003).”