The Regional Innovation Paradox: Innovation Policy and Industrial Policy
By C. Oughton, M. Landabaso, K. Morgan. 2002
497 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eac00ec913142859496f88b0e142498235f32889
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Michaela Trippl
- Ron A. Boschma
- Franz Tödtling
- Elvira Uyarra
- Ross Brown
- Kieron Flanagan
- Colin Mason
- R. Capello
In Political Science and International Relations
- Ron A. Boschma
- Michaela Trippl
- Elvira Uyarra
- Ross Brown
- Franz Tödtling
- Kieron Flanagan
- R. Capello
- Henning Kroll
Citations in the corpus
- Is a higher rate of R&D tax credit a panacea for low levels of R&D in disadvantaged regions? (2009, background): “With respect to other factors impacting on firm’s output, a regional dimension is added to this model, as there is a growing body of literature (referred to in Section II) on regional innovation systems underpinned by the role of knowledge (tacit knowledge in particular) and the notion of the ‘learn”
- Regional Innovation Systems in the Lisbon strategy (2005, methodology): “Second, following the arguments advanced by Oughton et al. (2002), we assess national differences in economic indicators and the independent pillars of knowledge inputs.”
- Orchestrating innovation networks: The case of innovation brokers in the agri-food sector (2010, background): “In recent years EU, national and regional policy makers have focused on enhancing the innovativeness of their economies by stimulating inter-organizational cooperation by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (Freel 2003; Howells 2005; Oughton, Landabaso, and Morgan 2002).”
- Policies for science, technology and innovation:: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting (2008, background): “STI policies are increasingly being designed and/or implemented at the supra- and sub-national levels (Bache, 2004; Lyall, 2007; Keating, 1998; Oughton et al., 2002).”
- Cooperation-based innovators and peripheral cooperators: An empirical analysis of their characteristics and behavior (2010, background): “Also, if partners are located nearby, there will be time and cost savings (Goe et al., 2000; Oughton et al., 2002) and the coordination of tasks will be easer (Carrinczeaux et al.”
- Local social knowledge management: Community actors, institutions and multilevel governance in regional foresight exercises (2004, background): “This shift in governance style is seen as necessary to promote the qualities of institutional thickness and social capital associated with learning regions [ 16 ].”
- Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: insights from the Dutch agricultural sector (2009, background): “This calls for the development of ‘soft indicators’ to measure activities such as network formation and learning [18,42,75].”
- One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach (2005, background): “At the European level there are the structural funds, the RIS/RITTS program, and the framework programs for R&D and technological development (Oughton et al. 2002, Landabaso and Mouton 2003).”
- Inside the high-tech black box: A critique of technology entrepreneurship policy (2014, background): “Processes such as knowledge spillovers, agglomeration economies and external economies also operate differently at the level of a region (Oughton et al., 2002).”
- Nurturing novelty: Regional innovation policy in the age of smart specialisation (2017, background): “…of austerity” has compounded the long-standing developmental problems associated with the regional innovation paradox, which reflects the fact that the regional economy and the regional polity are unable to absorb and deploy the funds that are earmarked to promote innovation (Oughton et al, 2002).”
- From theory to practice in smart specialization strategy: emerging limits and possible future trajectories (2016, background): “lobbying or the defence of the existing industrial status quo (Oughton et al., 2002).”
- Output Additionality of Public Support for Innovation: Evidence for Irish Manufacturing Plants (2010, background): “In each case, however, grant-based incentives to support R&D and innovation remain important, particularly as a means of stimulating innovative activity among smaller firms, those innovating for the first time or those in more rural or peripheral areas (Oughton et al., 2002).”