Nurturing novelty: Regional innovation policy in the age of smart specialisation
By K. Morgan. 2017
186 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5357f5c6113a5db44441251d0ec2e70cfbb57a2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Michaela Trippl
- Ron A. Boschma
- Markus Grillitsch
- R. Hassink
- Pierre-Alexandre Balland
- Arne Isaksen
- Franz Tödtling
- David L. Rigby
In Political Science and International Relations
- Michaela Trippl
- Markus Grillitsch
- Ron A. Boschma
- R. Hassink
- Elvira Uyarra
- Huiwen Gong
- Pierre-Alexandre Balland
- Franz Tödtling
Citations in the corpus
- Place-based innovation policy for industrial diversification in regions (2018, background): “new industrial paths due to rigidities in policy repertoires (Morgan, 2016).”
- Smart specialization policy in the European Union: relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification (2019, background): “Another building block of smart specialization policy is the need for the right institutional governance structure to be in place at the local level (Grillitsch, 2016; McCann, van Oort, & Goddard, 2017; Morgan, 2017).”
- Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces (2020, background): “, 2017), the support structure for innovation and entrepreneurship (Mason and Brown, 2014; Asheim and Gertler, 2005), as well as the institutional environment supporting or hindering Schumpeterian innovative entrepreneurship (Fritsch and Wyrwich, 2014; Morgan, 2016).”
- Regional innovation policies for new path development – beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views (2018, background): “…on policy approaches such as smart specialization (European Commission, 2012; Foray, 2015), new industrial policy (Rodrik, 2004), modern forms of governance (Sabel & Zeitlin, 2012) and calls to rethink the role of the state (Mazzucato, 2013; Morgan, 2017) reflect these concerns in apparent ways.”
- New directions for RIS studies and policies in the face of grand societal challenges (2021, background): “This includes the involvement of new actors, an engagement with sustainability goals, and new ways of coordinating more open innovation processes (Morgan, 2017).”
- Spatial inequalities and policies in South Africa: Place-based or people-centred? (2017, background): “National innovation policies have very uneven impacts because the capacity of firms and universities to absorb this support varies greatly between regions (Morgan, 2016).”
- Six critical questions about smart specialization (2019, background): “…failure many regional policy-makers make when thinking about a smart specialization strategy is that they ‘ … simply recycle cluster programmes’.1 Also Morgan (2017) stresses that smart specialization does not start from scratch: due to policy path dependence and cognitive lock-ins among…”
- Rethinking Path Creation: A Geographical Political Economy Approach (2019, background): “Here, path creation refers to the emergence and growth of new industries and economic activities in regions, reflecting the broader evolutionary interest in the generation of novelty (Morgan 2017).”
- Shaping smart specialization: the role of place-specific factors in advanced, intermediate and less-developed European regions (2019, background): “Past policy practices and policy path dependency may be powerful barriers to the adoption of new innovation policy approaches (Aranguren, Magro, Navarro, & Wilson, 2018; Morgan, 2017).”
- Public procurement, innovation and industrial policy: Rationales, roles, capabilities and implementation (2020, background): “…acknowledged (although see e.g. Martin and Coenen, 2015; Gee and Uyarra, 2013) and public procurement is especially neglected in regional innovation policy thinking (Morgan, 2017)—despite public procurement having been one of the key determinants of the radical transformation of Silicon Valley.”
- Exploring the normative turn in regional innovation policy: responsibility and the quest for public value (2019, unknown): “It was proposed as a means to ensure that innovation responds to the values, needs and expectations of society, delivering solutions to a number of societal challenges (European Commission, 2014).”