Policies for science, technology and innovation:: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting

By M. Laranja, Elvira Uyarra, Kieron Flanagan. 2008

340 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27fdfd113bd0c4e9af8e54170e5511fd241bc28e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Four dangers in innovation policy studies – and how to avoid them (2016, background): “The idealised ‘policy-maker’ is treated as a largely passive recipient of unproblematic and straightforward translated recommendations (Laranja, Uyarra, and Flanagan 2008).”
R&D policy instruments – a critical review of what we do and don’t know (2016, background): “…• a shift in focus from market failure to systemic failure, bringing a changed rationale for public intervention (see e.g. Edquist 2001, 2011; Braun 2005; Laranja, Uyarra, and Flanagan 2008; Dodgson et al. 2011; Gustafsson and Autio 2011); • the growing emphasis on the notion of open…”
The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems (2013, background): “…paramount importance for effective policy design as they help shape actual policy making decisions by providing the justifications for government intervention, and motivating the implementation of specific instruments or policy mix choices (Laranja et al., 2008; Nelson, 2009; Bergek et al., 2010).”
Path Renewal in Old Industrial Regions: Possibilities and Limitations for Regional Innovation Policy (2015, background): “In terms of the theoretical rationale for the design of policy and choice of instruments, RIS draws on the more general innovation system perspective (LARANJA et al., 2008; BORRAS and EDQUIST, 2013).”
Reconceptualising the 'policy mix' for innovation (2011, background): “In fact Lindblom (1958) offered a similar critique of the assumption that policy processes need active co-ordination (and therefore the creation of new roles, structures or institutions for co-ordination) several decades ago(32). With a large number of explicit and implicit, and potentially mutually”
Innovation Policy for Grand Challenges. An Economic Geography Perspective (2015, background): “Innovation and innovation policy have been a topic of central concern for economic geographers (Feldman 2000) who have considered and examined the responsibility for policy action at different spatial scales (Laranja et al. 2008).”