A review of research on metacognition in science education: current and future directions
By Anat Zohar, Sarit Barzilai. 2013
418 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9c13f2fd4e7433abd14f9eb879ec4f32cd3b4e0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Charlotte Dignath
- M. Veenman
- Lev Tankelevitch
- Sean Rintel
- Dorit Alt
- N. Raichel
- Ernesto Panadero
- M. Stel
In Education
- Charlotte Dignath
- M. Veenman
- Lev Tankelevitch
- Sean Rintel
- Dorit Alt
- N. Raichel
- M. Stel
- Bracha Kramarski
Citations in the corpus
- The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AI (2023, background): “Studies have shown that improved metacognition helps individuals with management of time, focus, and effort [212], problem-solving [67], academic performance [45, 52, 106, 126, 180, 214], emotional well-being [200], and overall decision-making [206].”
- Reflective journaling and metacognitive awareness: insights from a longitudinal study in higher education (2020, background): “Indeed, posing questions is considered an effective medium to prompt students to engage in metacognitive reflection (Zohar & Barzilai, 2013), however, Dyment and O’Connell (2011) raise concerns about their effective implementation.”
- The Role of Direct Strategy Instruction and Indirect Activation of Self-Regulated Learning—Evidence from Classroom Observation Studies (2020, background): “…variables beyond the classroom observations, either focused on teachers’ pedagogical beliefs or their self-efficacy beliefs, but only very little research has addressed teachers’ knowledge about SRL and their pedagogical knowledge about how to promote SRL so far (see also Zohar and Barzilai 2013).”