Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Users Manual

By J. Mayer, Peter Salovey, D. Caruso. 2002

856 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e95dcfbecaef3280b830517b14729f47afe839fd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. M. Zeidner
2. Gerald Matthews
3. R. Roberts
4. Marc A. Brackett
5. K. V. Petrides
6. J. Mayer
7. P. Lopes
8. N. Clarke

Citations in the corpus

• The relationship between emotional intelligence and leadership in school leaders: a systematic review (2021, background): “The reported full-scale reliability of the MSCEIT is .93, with branch scores ranging from .79 to .91 (Mayer et al., 2002).”
• Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012, methodology): “Emotional intelligence has been assessed in terms of abilities to perceive emotions accurately, understand emotion, and use emotion to facilitate thinking (Mayer et al., 2002).”
• Measuring Trait Emotional Intelligence (2005, background): “It is perhaps still too early to pass final judgment on the effectiveness of these procedures and it should be noted that some progress has been achieved over the many iterations that the best of these tests have undergone (e.g., Mayer et al., 2002).”
• The Relationship Among Emotional Intelligence, Task Performance, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors (2006, background): “Mayer, Salovey, and Caruso (2002) developed an emotional intelligence scale (MSCEIT) that best reflects the Mayer and Salovey (1997) conceptualization of emotional intelligence.”
• Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT V2.0. (2003, methodology): “Compared with the MEIS, reliabilities were higher overall at the task level (e.g., Mayer et al., 1999; Mayer et al., 2002b) but were sometimes lower than is desirable.”
• Promoting Emotional Intelligence and Career Decision Making Among Italian High School Students (2011, methodology): “We assessed EI through both the Italian version (D’Amico & Curci, in press) of a performance measure of EI, developed by Mayer et al. (2002), and a self-report measure of EI based on the model of Salovey and Mayer (1990).”
• The relationships among social intelligence, emotional intelligence and cultural intelligence (2009, background): “This is similar to the EI skills involved in emotion management, which involve the appropriate regulation of feeling (Salovey and Pizarro, 2003) and the effective management of others’ emotions (Mayer et al., 2002).”
• The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity. (2008, methodology): “83 Social cognition Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test, perceiving emotions branch (23) Branch score using general consensus scoring 0.”
• Emotional intelligence and its relation with hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: A prospective study. (2011, methodology): “It was expected that EI as measured by MSCEIT would not be substantively related to personality test, although some small correlation might be found (Mayer et al., 2002).”