Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT V2.0.

By J. Mayer, Peter Salovey, D. Caruso, G. Sitarenios. Emotion, 2003

1,796 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e7767e8e051c509b1fe52669fd8cfeb28a29bf11

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Emotional Intelligence and Education: A critical review (2007, methodology): “However, critical evaluation of tools such as the Multi-Factor Emotional Intelligence Scale (Mayer et al., 2003) has suggested that the emotional intelligence construct is distinctive and useful (Ciarrochi et al., 2000).”
Emotional Intelligence as an Ability: Theory, Challenges, and New Directions (2018, methodology): “The correctness of the MSCEIT responses can be determined in one of two ways: (a) based on congruence with the answers of emotion experts (expert scoring) or (b) based on the proportion of the sample that endorsed the same answer (general consensus scoring) (Mayer et al., 2003; Papadogiannis et al.,”
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test V 2.0 (MSCEIT) (2008, background): “As Gignac further noted, Mayer et al. (2003) constrained the covariances to equality between the Perceiving Emotions and Using Emotions factors, and between the Understanding and Managing Emotions factors due to the high covariance between the Perceiving and Using Emotions factors in their best…”
Emotional Intelligence: What Does the Research Really Indicate? (2006, background): “We already have described the study by Rosete and Ciarrochi (2005), which found a significant relation between EI and leadership effectiveness in a group of executives. Another recent study suggests that this is not an isolated finding. In the first published meta-analytic study related to EI, Van R”
A review of key issues in the measurement of children’s social and emotional skills (2010, background): “For instance, Warwick and Nettleback (2004) found that S&ES correlated with certain personality variables when measured by the Trait MetaMood Scale (TMMS), a typical behaviour measure (Salovey, Mayer, Goldman, Turvey & Palfai, 1995), but not when measured by the MSCEIT, a maximal behaviour measure (”
Measuring Emotional Intelligence in Early Adolescence With the MSCEIT-YV (2012, methodology): “Expressing emotion refers to the communication of feelings, including the appropriate ways and times to express them as determined by various display rules.”
The Validity of the MSCEIT: Additional Analyses and Evidence (2012, background): “Despite their diversity (from North America, Europe, and the Middle East), their level of agreement as to answers was also higher than that in the general sample (Mayer et al., 2003).”
Emotional intelligence: new ability or eclectic traits? (2008, methodology): “…of an overall EI, and four-factor models fit the data adequately, with other models possible (notably, a three factor model that combines Branches 1 and 2 is also plausible; Gignac, 2005; Mayer, Panter, Salovey, & Sitaraneos, 2005; Mayer et al., 2003; Palmer, Gignac, Manocha, & Stough, 2005).”
Emotional intelligence and its relationship to workplace performance outcomes of leadership effectiveness (2005, methodology): “In a recent study by Mayer et al. (2003), the MSCEIT was found to show reasonable reliability and support for the dimensional structure postulated by Mayer and Salovey (1997) of EI.”