Multilevel Structural Equation Models for Contextual Factors

64 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Contagion effect of global leaders' positive psychological capital on followers: does distance and quality of relationship matter? (2013, methodology): “As indicated, due to the complex sampling procedure consisting of multiple direct responses made by followers of each leader, results of this study were determined through MSEM (see Bovaird 2007).”
A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. (2010, methodology): “10 There is some ambiguity over whether to use the total sample size, the number of clusters, or the average cluster size in formulas for fit indices in MSEM (Bovaird, 2007; Selig, Card, & Little, 2008). Mehta and Neale (2005) suggested that the number of clusters is the most appropriate sample size”
Efficacy of Collaborative Strategic Reading With Middle School Students* (2011, methodology): “Estimates of model fit are provided as well as a means of evaluating a given model’s accuracy in representing patterns among the observed data and as a tool for comparing nested models and evaluating statistical significance (Bovaird, 2007; Mehta & Neale, 2005).”
Overqualification and Subjective Well-Being at Work: The Moderating Role of Job Autonomy and Culture (2015, methodology): “Also, the MUML estimator has computational and convergence advantage over full information maximum likelihood (FIML) estimator and has similar estimation to FIML estimator (Bovaird 2007).”