describing sexual behavior in the era of the internet: a typology for empirical research

By James F. Quinn, C. Forsyth. 2005

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e87bb68c570af09f7f03917fcac55c974bba8394

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Mark D. Griffiths
2. Thomas J. Holt
3. Daria J. Kuss
4. Zsolt Demetrovics
5. Joël Billieux
6. Halley M. Pontes
7. Xavier Carbonell
8. Jeffrey L. Derevensky

In Gender Studies

1. Mark D. Griffiths
2. Anita L. Blanchard
3. Christine A. Henle

In Sociology and Political Science

1. K. Blevins
2. Mark D. Griffiths
3. Thomas J. Holt
4. Daria J. Kuss
5. Zsolt Demetrovics
6. Laura Widyanto
7. Scott E. Caplan
8. Joël Billieux

Citations in the corpus

• Internet sex addiction: A review of empirical research (2012, background): “Some claim that ‘‘technology has transformed vicarious sex into an increasingly viable and attractive substitute for interpersonal forms of sexual fulfilment’’ (Quinn & Forsyth, 2005, p. 197).”
• Examining Sex Work from the Client's Perspective: Assessing Johns Using on-line Data (2007, background): “This technology has also been co-opted by the illicit sex trade to offer a vast array of sexual services to individuals around the world (Lane 2000 ; Quinn and Forsyth 2005 ).”