Dyads Can Be Groups (and Often Are)

By Kipling D. Williams. 2010

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e82f135124f2d9c17a60f6ef406fab3f013b5532

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Susanne Narciss
2. Hermann Körndle
3. Mary J. Waller
4. F. Zijlstra
5. Cornelia Schoor
6. Sybil Phillips

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Susanne Narciss
2. Mary J. Waller
3. F. Zijlstra
4. Sybil Phillips

Citations in the corpus

• Setting the tone: Early interaction patterns in swift-starting teams as a predictor of effectiveness (2012, background): “We are aware that the status of dyads as teams has been debated in recent literature (Moreland, 2010; Williams, 2010), with some in favor of and some opposed to the classification of dyads as teams.”
• Regulation During Cooperative and Collaborative Learning: A Theory-Based Review of Terms and Concepts (2015, background): “, Moreland, 2010; Williams, 2010), we include in this article both dyads and small groups within cooperative and collaborative learning (cf. Dillenbourg, 1999; Iiskala, Vauras, Lehtinen, & Salonen, 2011; Volet, Summers, et al., 2009; Williams, 2010).”