Varieties of institutional systems: A contextual taxonomy of understudied countries

By Stav Fainshmidt, William Q. Judge, Ruth V. Aguilera, Adam Smith. 2016

332 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Demography, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af35810bdcd5632c1599e901a32bb93de5a81754

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Jonathan P. Doh
2. Aldo Musacchio
3. Mike Wright
4. Mehmet Demirbag
5. Ekrem Tatoğlu
6. G. Wood
7. Selim Zaim
8. I. Ciftci

In Demography

1. Mehmet Demirbag
2. Ekrem Tatoğlu
3. Jonathan P. Doh
4. Mike Wright

In Finance

1. Jonathan P. Doh
2. Aldo Musacchio
3. G. Wood
4. Mike Wright
5. Douglas J. Cumming

Citations in the corpus

• Mapping the business systems of 61 major economies: A taxonomy and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems research (2018, unknown): “And exploring a range of emerging economies, Fainshmidt et al. (2016) identified seven types of clusters.”
• Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Turkey (2019, background): “Again, if family owned firms are supported by strong domestic networks of relationships (Fainshmidt et al., 2016), they may be less experienced in optimizing more transactional or “arm’s length” relationships encountered in the advanced societies (Wood et al.”
• State capitalism in international context: Varieties and variations (2020, background): “While Fainshmidt et al. (2018) consider “ state-led ” countries as a separate category, our varieties of state capitalism cut across their categories as we focus on “ levels ” and varieties of state influence.”