Visual Methodologies

By T. Hart. 2008

605 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6fe54703a1b9296d760ae76cde380ecd56d9c1b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

In Urban Studies

Citations in the corpus

Expanding Perspectives for Comprehending Visual Images in Multimodal Texts (2011, background): “Visual grammar, iconology, and media studies require that readers analyze texts at the site of production, image and reception, or audience (Rose, 2001).”
Grounded Theory Methods for Mental Health Practitioners (2011, background): “…have used focus groups to generate material (Henwood & Pidgeon, 2003), reflective commentary of events using Interpersonal Process Recall (Rennie, 2005) and increasingly recognize that visual media may be a suitable form of data for qualitative researchers to analyse (Gleeson et al., 2005).”
Visual Methods (2007, background): “In part, these three techniques vary according to whether the photographs are produced by the guest or the researcher (Rose 2001).”
Destination Visual Image and Expectation of Experiences (2011, methodology): “First, image content analysis proposed by Rose (2001) was used to analyze the nature of the images. This study follows the procedure of image content analysis in a previous study by Tussyadiah (2010), whereby images were analyzed by looking at the settings, objects, positions, and notions.”
Responsibilities, tensions and ways forward: parents’ perspectives on children’s sexuality education (2017, background): “The use of photos and imagery in interviews provides a context in which to explore perceptions of and attitudes about cultural practices (Rose 2001; Hurworth et al. 2005).”
Multiple text analysis in narrative research: visual, written, and spoken stories of experience (2009, background): “Rose (2001) outlines three sites where the meaning of an image is made: in the production of an image, in the image itself, and the context in which various audiences see images.”
Handbook of Research and Policy in Art Education (2004, methodology): “The image is also constitutive of cultural practices, individual process, and information systems that are located within spaces and places; is evidence of mediated processes; and is indicative of visual regimes that may be tangible or invisible (Emmison & Smith, 2000; Rose, 2001; Van Leeuwen & Jewi”
Making the familiar strange: can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? (2010, neutral): “Thus, visuality and the overlapping term scopic regime, refer to the ways in which audiences bring their own ways of seeing and other knowledges to bear on an image (Rose 2001).”