Making the familiar strange: can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible?

By Dawn Mannay. 2010

385 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The centrality of the researcher and their position in relation to the research setting has been subject to controversy and long standing debates threaded with the narratives of insider and outsider myths. Insiders are often charged with the tendency to present their group in an unrealistically favourable light, and their work is often considered to be overshadowed by the enclosed, self-contained world of common understanding. This article draws upon data generated by six participants from a research project, which aimed to explore and represent the everyday experiences of working-class mothers and daughters residing on a peripheral social housing estate. The article describes how I, as an indigenous researcher, employed visual methods of data production in order to suspend my preconceptions of familiar territory, and facilitate an understanding of the unique viewpoints of mothers and daughters on the margins of contemporary Britain. The article focuses the usefulness of the approach for making the familiar strange when the researchers own experience mirrors that of their participants.

Subfields: Conservation, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/020a23198195bb319cf53a1afc650356a5ddad28

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Conservation

  1. C. Snyder
  2. J. Sheridan
  3. K. Chamberlain
  4. Trudie Cain
  5. A. Dupuis

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. J. Sheridan
  2. A. Dupuis
  3. C. Snyder
  4. K. Chamberlain
  5. Trudie Cain

Citations in the corpus