Distributional impacts of road pricing: The truth behind the myth
By G. Santos, Laurent Rojey. 2004
163 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Transportation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e626438138385b22c66025d467b14a993a4f564a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Tim Schwanen
- R. H. M. Pereira
- G. Schuitema
- David Banister
- David M Levinson
- Takuya Maruyama
- Edoardo Marcucci
- Tommy Gärling
In Transportation
- David M Levinson
- Tim Schwanen
- R. H. M. Pereira
- David Banister
- G. Schuitema
- Edoardo Marcucci
- Jérôme Massiani
- Romeo Danielis
Citations in the corpus
- Modelling the effects of road pricing on traffic in Singapore (2005, background): “In Europe, although road pricing schemes have been considered and evaluated in many cities (Jones and Hervik, 1992; Santos and Rojey, 2004), until recently only the Norwegian toll rings have been implemented and provided some real data.”
- Reducing Urban Road Transportation Externalities: Road Pricing in Theory and in Practice (2011, unknown): “However, fuel-related externalities generally account for a small fraction of the total external societal costs of driving. Tsekeris and Voß (2008), Parry (2009), estimate that for light-duty vehicles in the United States, fuel-related externalities are eighteen cents per gallon, compared to time-de”
- Equity Effects of Road Pricing: A Review (2010, background): “…depends on circumstances, and tests via traffic simulation for proposed cordon toll scheme in three UK towns (Cambridge, Northampton and Bedford), even before redistribution, because of the mix of incomes and mix of transit passengers, pedestrians, bicyclists and drivers (Santos and Rojey, 2004).”
- The urban road pricing scheme to curb pollution in Milan, Italy: Description, impacts and preliminary cost-benefit analysis assessment (2010, background): “…be politically accepted; does provide substantial toll revenues to the local administration who can allocate them according to the political agreement with its constituency; and can be a progressive tax in its own right, before any compensation scheme is implemented (Santos and Rojey, 2004, p. 38).”
- Distributive justice and equity in transportation (2016, background): “We hope it will bring valuable insights to other aspects of equity related to transportation pricing and finance (Pucher, 1982; Santos & Rojey, 2004), civil rights and spatial discrimination (Karner & Niemeier, 2013; Sanchez, Stolz, & Ma, 2003), and environmental justice (Chakraborty, 2006;…”
- Travel Demand Management Targeting Reduced Private Car Use: Effectiveness, Public Acceptability and Political Feasibility (2007, background): “Santos and Rojey (2004) demonstrated that the effects of road pricing are progressive, regressive, or neutral depending on where car users live.”
- Efficiency and equity comparison of cordon- and area-based road pricing schemes using a trip-chain equilibrium model (2007, background): “From the fruitful research into the cordon-based pricing, several modelling studies paid attentions on the evaluation of performances of the scheme with different designs (May et al 2002; Santos 2004; de Palma et al 2005), equity impact of the scheme (Giuliano 1992; Yang and Zhang 2002; Sumalee 2003”